Migration will end up in the lack of gadget. I have just run a highly
sophisticated set of tests to verify it and yes - it vanished :)
Point taken. Pages with gadget will need to be adjusted.
Is it a concern for you and would you prefer to keep it?
On 12/03/2013 08:11 AM, Julien Viet wrote:
I agree with the change, however doesn’t this change triggers
migration
issues for the pages that references it ?
did you try a migration with a portal having the gadget ?
On 03 Dec 2013, at 00:02, Nick Scavelli <nscavell(a)redhat.com
<mailto:nscavell@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> I have made a PR to remove the Export/Import GWT gadget
>
https://github.com/gatein/gatein-portal/pull/711 from GateIn (hooray,
> finally !). The gadget has been replaced by the new Site Admin portlet
> so no longer needed. I believe I removed all occurences of the gadget
> in gatein, however if any extensions include the gwtGadgets as part of
> their PortalContainerDefinitionPlugin in conf/configuration.xml, it
> should be removed as well. Not sure if the server will still start up
> if the dependency is listed but the war is not included. I'll prob
> take a look at this tomorrow. Would be nice if the server still
> started but logged a warning or something.
>
> - Nick
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
--
Bolesław Dawidowicz
JBoss Portal Platform Architect | GateIn Portal Project Lead