Re: [gatein-dev] A word about Exo kernel - MC integration
On Oct 8, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Julien Viet wrote:
1/ I agree with you that it is not acceptable to not have source code
+1
2/ I don't find this argument valid from my perspective, can you
instead tell us what it would bring to use MC instead of pico
Less invasive DI framework. Better support for wiring of POJOs. For
example, with the current implementation, I had to add a useless (from
the code perspective) argument to my service constructor just to make
sure that the service would be instantiated after some other one: real
bad design!
I do agree that eating our own dog food is not a goal in itself but
any DI framework that forces you to implement non-business interfaces
and doesn't allow to explicit dependencies outside of your code cannot
really call itself a real DI framework...
Cordialement / Best,
Chris
==
Principal Software Engineer / JBoss Enterprise Middleware Red Hat, Inc.
Follow JBoss Portal: http://jbossportal.blogspot.com / http://twitter.com/jbossportal
Follow me: http://metacosm.codepuccino.com / http://twitter.com/metacosm