actually 5: reimplement the NG service **persistence** using the in memory store and
validate it with the tests decoupled from Step 3.
persistence are quite low level and easy to implement, for instance:
and also I repackaged the NG services to org.gatein.portal.mop
On Jan 23, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Julien Viet <julien(a)julienviet.com> wrote:
Hi,
here is a status update with a milestone reached. The ram persistence and the data import
are working which is a good news, let me explain the details here:
The goal is to get rid of DataStorage interface for many reasons. A few services have
been developed for 3 years with goal to supplement it one day: NavigationService,
DescriptionService and PageService . They have all been developed to fix a particular
issue with DataStorage (performance or scalability). So a few things were still managed by
the DataStorage : sites and layouts.
--------------------
Step1: extraction of the framework used in the NavigationService that is very powerful
for managing hierarchy synchronization (i.e load/update/rebase/save) and make it generic
enough for reuse. Added a couple of missing features on it.
Step2: new services have been created to replace to finish this replacement : SiteService
for managing sites (similar to PageService) and LayoutService that takes care of loading
the layout of a page or a site. (consider a layout as an attachment of a navigation node
or a page). Those services have been implemented with existing MOP and the goal was to
make nearly all existing module pass. Only tests for dashboard do not pass because the
dashboard impl is a hack that should not survive a long time (but persistence is very
fine). The SiteService is quite trivial (pretty much like PageService). The LayoutService
was also trivial because of the reuse of the Step 1 (which is a **big** win).
Step3: all the NG services have been decoupled from MOP introducing an abstraction layer
(SitePersistence for SiteService, PagePersistence for PageService, etc…). At this point
the NG services tests are decoupled too.
Step4: code an in memory store for ram storage .
Step5: reimplement the NG services using the in memory store and validate it with the
tests decoupled from Step 3.
Step6: now there is still some work on the import of data. It must be decoupled from the
UserPortalConfigService because it is legacy and nearly fix it. The import code was
decoupled from the NewPortalConfigListener (a component plugin of
UserPortalConfigService). Then a new class wrapping this has been created for importing
data.
Step7: update the web portal created 2 weeks ago to boot it (with Arquillian of course)
--------------------
So the good news is that it works fine and is reliable enough for continuing the web
portal development.
The boot is fast enough for providing productivity, running a single test takes 5 seconds
on my laptop:
1/ web server boot
2/ data import
3/ juzu boot
4/ invoke a controller with selenium
For the fun here is a snapshot of the content of the ram store I made for checking the
entire content was loaded :
https://gist.github.com/4599534
Julien
On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Bolesław Dawidowicz <boleslaw.dawidowicz(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Sounds good
>
> On Wed 16 Jan 2013 02:07:31 PM CET, Julien Viet wrote:
>> I was thinking about renaming the services those services to use the org.gatein
package:
>>
>> NavigationService, PageService, DescriptionService and the new LayoutService and
SiteService
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Julien Viet <julien(a)julienviet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> it is not possible because the data model is simplified according to the
InPlaceEditing spec (
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/InPlaceEditing)
>>>
>>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Thomas Heute <theute(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the update !
>>>>
>>>> Does some of that work could be incorporated into incremental 3.x
releases ?
>>>>
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>> On 01/15/2013 04:24 PM, Julien Viet wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> here is a short update.
>>>>>
>>>>> Focusing on the services for data that are all JCR based, which is an
issue for testing the portal rewrite, so for now focusing on improving this part. The goal
is to have in memory implementation of the services for testing purposes.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the moment I'm working on the rewrite of the remaining legacy
service DataStorage. This service has a strong coupling to JCR, the new services
introduced (NavigationService, PageService, etc…) are coupled but not that much.
>>>>>
>>>>> I started the LayoutService that focus on the layout aspect of a UI
structure and extracted code from NavigationService for reusing in NavigationService. The
DataStorage now uses it for loading and saving pages. This is a good step forward.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm keeping the DataStorage at the moment for two reasons:
>>>>>
>>>>> - we want to continue to use the normal gatein with webui for a
little while
>>>>> - the data storage is heavily tested so the testing of the underlying
services through data storage is a good thing to have
>>>>>
>>>>> The next step is to write a SiteService that load and save sites
without their template. When it is done, the DataStorage loading/saving PortalConfig will
combine the SiteService and the LayoutService for loading configs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julien
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Julien Viet <julien(a)julienviet.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just to let you know that I'm starting 4.0.0 in my github
repository :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Initial plan is to come with a basic implementation rapidly (1
month?) and then make it formal with a spec when it becomes complex but for now:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - get away from UI component oriented programming and uses simple
MVC programming
>>>>>> - rely Juzu for the web application framework
>>>>>> - uses javax.inject for IOC controllers and bridge with the
kernel
>>>>>> - uses Arquillian for developing with testing
>>>>>> - reuses existing services (i.e stuff in components/*)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For now dev is there
https://github.com/vietj/gatein-portal/tree/4.0.0 but it can be moved to the gatein
organization any time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current stuff of course is quite empty but I hope it will
become quickly something, but there is Juzu and Arquillian which are very productive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to help, it's open for business!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"JBoss / eXo" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to jbossexo(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jbossexo+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jbossexo?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gatein-dev mailing list
>> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
>