1:51 p.m.
Ok I see now the new page
has it to add in the index page?
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/GateInSpecifications
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:49 PM, <gatein-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org> wrote:
Send gatein-dev mailing list submissions to
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gatein-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
gatein-dev-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of gatein-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: enable/disable users (Julien Viet)
2. Re: gatein-dev Digest, Vol 43, Issue 7 (Luca Stancapiano)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:18:11 +0200
From: Julien Viet <julien(a)julienviet.com>
Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] enable/disable users
To: Boles?aw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
Cc: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <0EAB4969-4317-449B-9EC2-92D6D8F8970A(a)julienviet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Luca,
I started this spec page about this feature :
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/DisabledUser
would you mind to use it instead of the new page you created ?
thanks
Julien
On Apr 12, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Boles?aw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Could you start a specification for this?
>
> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/GateInSpecifications
>
> After you write down requirements you have in mind we could discuss and
> agree on how it should look in final form.
>
> On 04/12/2013 12:21 PM, Luca Stancapiano wrote:
>> Hi, I've seen there is not still the workflow for the enabling or
>> disabling of the users. It was in the old jboss portal. Are there
>> developements in progress?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gatein-dev mailing list
>> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:49:00 +0200
From: Luca Stancapiano <l.stancapiano(a)sourcesense.com>
Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] gatein-dev Digest, Vol 43, Issue 7
To: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
<
CAO3WqDXQbm3zeLkekoZsVo67F01R9hpH4TFA9NVfP7zvgEj5mQ(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
done:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/EnableDisableUsers
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:28 PM, <gatein-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org
>wrote:
> Send gatein-dev mailing list submissions to
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> gatein-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> gatein-dev-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of gatein-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: PortletApplicationDeployer listeners (Ken Finnigan)
> 2. Re: PortletApplicationDeployer listeners (Julien Viet)
> 3. enable/disable users (Luca Stancapiano)
> 4. Re: enable/disable users (Boles?aw Dawidowicz)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:03:29 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ken Finnigan <kfinniga(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] PortletApplicationDeployer listeners
> To: Julien Viet <julien(a)julienviet.com>
> Cc: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <734306130.3082080.1365696209274.JavaMail.root(a)redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> That's fine, initially it didn't seem like the same listener instances
> would be applied to all deployments, not a problem.
>
> In terms of retrieving the portlet filter instance to actually perform
> injection on, is there a cleaner way to get it than this:
>
> filterClasses.add(ActionFilter.class);
> filterClasses.add(EventFilter.class);
> filterClasses.add(RenderFilter.class);
> filterClasses.add(ResourceFilter.class);
>
> ManagedPortletFilter managedPortletFilter = (ManagedPortletFilter)
> managedObject;
>
> PortletFilterImpl portletFilterImpl = (PortletFilterImpl)
> managedPortletFilter.getPortletFilter();
>
> PortletFilter portletFilterInstance;
>
> for (Class type : filterClasses) {
> portletFilterInstance = (PortletFilter) portletFilterImpl.instance(type);
>
> // If not null, then use it and skip rest of loop
>
> }
>
> Thanks
> Ken
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > From: "Julien Viet" <julien(a)julienviet.com>
> > To: "Ken Finnigan" <kfinniga(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 8:12:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] PortletApplicationDeployer listeners
>
> > Yes it is expected.
>
> > The listener may want to be aware of all deployments (for maintaining a
> > registry of all portlets with a single listener instead of
> adding/removing N
> > listeners where N is the number of deployments).
>
> > This is similar to the JMX JMImplementation MBean that send
notifications
> > about MBean life cycle for any MBean added/removed from the MBeanServer
> as
> > the intent is originally the same.
>
> > What is wrong with having a single listener if you can associate the
CDI
> meta
> > data with the deployed portlets ?
>
> > I would proceed in two steps :
>
> > 1/ upon deployment : prepare the CDI info for all portlets and add to a
> map a
> > list of portlet id -> cdi meta data for the portlet (injection etc?)
> > 2/ upon portlet created event : lookup for cdi work to do from portlet
> id and
> > if it exists then honour the cdi integration
>
> > On Apr 9, 2013, at 10:14 PM, Ken Finnigan < kfinniga(a)redhat.com >
wrote:
>
> > > All,
> >
>
> > > In implementing CDI injection into GenericPortlet and PortletFilter
> > > instances, I had assumed that I could add a
> > > ManagedObjectRegistryEventListener, specifically for CDI processing,
> and
> > > add
> > > it to the broadcaster in PortletApplicationDeployer for only those
> > > PortletApplicationDeployment's that needed CDI injection. ie. the
> listener
> > > would be added before creating a PortletApplicationDeployment and
then
> > > removed straight afterwards to ensure that portlet deployments that
had
> > > nothing to do with CDI, were not calling the listener for all event
> > > notifications for no reason.
> >
>
> > > An unexpected consequence of this is that I've discovered the
> broadcaster
> > > list of listeners is the exact same instance across all
> > > PortletApplicationDeployment instances. So when I removed the CDI
> listener
> > > from broadcaster on PortletApplicationDeployer, it also removed that
> > > listener from the PortletApplicationDeployment that had just been
> created.
> >
>
> > > Is that expected? I'd find it unusual that its not possible to add a
> > > listener
> > > specific to a deployment that should not be applied to all of them.
> >
>
> > > Wondering if ManagedObjectRegistryEventBroadcaster needs to support
> cloning
> > > to facilitate this functionality?
> >
>
> > > Any other thoughts on a better way to do this are appreciated, as I
> > > certainly
> > > feel it unnecessary to defensively code my listener for all types of
> > > portlets it can be attached to when it doesn't need to.
> >
>
> > > Ken
> >
> > > ========================
> >
> > > Senior Software Engineer / JBoss Enterprise Middleware Red Hat, Inc.
> >
>
> > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > > gatein-dev mailing list
> >
> > > gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/gatein-dev/attachments/20130411/47f5d991...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:25:35 +0200
> From: Julien Viet <julien(a)julienviet.com>
> Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] PortletApplicationDeployer listeners
> To: Ken Finnigan <kfinniga(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <5D2D0218-7B8E-4DBE-92B1-8E410391EC28(a)julienviet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> no there is not (because there was no need to expose such internal things
> until we work out this integration).
>
> you should add a Filter getFilter() on the class that returns the
instance.
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Ken Finnigan <kfinniga(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > That's fine, initially it didn't seem like the same listener instances
> would be applied to all deployments, not a problem.
> >
> > In terms of retrieving the portlet filter instance to actually perform
> injection on, is there a cleaner way to get it than this:
> >
> > filterClasses.add(ActionFilter.class);
> > filterClasses.add(EventFilter.class);
> > filterClasses.add(RenderFilter.class);
> > filterClasses.add(ResourceFilter.class);
> >
> > ManagedPortletFilter managedPortletFilter = (ManagedPortletFilter)
> managedObject;
> >
> > PortletFilterImpl portletFilterImpl = (PortletFilterImpl)
> managedPortletFilter.getPortletFilter();
> >
> > PortletFilter portletFilterInstance;
> >
> > for (Class type : filterClasses) {
> > portletFilterInstance = (PortletFilter)
> portletFilterImpl.instance(type);
> >
> > // If not null, then use it and skip rest of loop
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ken
> >
> > From: "Julien Viet" <julien(a)julienviet.com>
> > To: "Ken Finnigan" <kfinniga(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 8:12:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] PortletApplicationDeployer listeners
> >
> > Yes it is expected.
> >
> > The listener may want to be aware of all deployments (for maintaining a
> registry of all portlets with a single listener instead of
adding/removing
> N listeners where N is the number of deployments).
> >
> > This is similar to the JMX JMImplementation MBean that send
> notifications about MBean life cycle for any MBean added/removed from the
> MBeanServer as the intent is originally the same.
> >
> > What is wrong with having a single listener if you can associate the
CDI
> meta data with the deployed portlets ?
> >
> > I would proceed in two steps :
> >
> > 1/ upon deployment : prepare the CDI info for all portlets and add to a
> map a list of portlet id -> cdi meta data for the portlet (injection
etc?)
> > 2/ upon portlet created event : lookup for cdi work to do from portlet
> id and if it exists then honour the cdi integration
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 9, 2013, at 10:14 PM, Ken Finnigan <kfinniga(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > In implementing CDI injection into GenericPortlet and PortletFilter
> instances, I had assumed that I could add a
> ManagedObjectRegistryEventListener, specifically for CDI processing, and
> add it to the broadcaster in PortletApplicationDeployer for only those
> PortletApplicationDeployment's that needed CDI injection. ie. the
listener
> would be added before creating a PortletApplicationDeployment and then
> removed straight afterwards to ensure that portlet deployments that had
> nothing to do with CDI, were not calling the listener for all event
> notifications for no reason.
> >
> > An unexpected consequence of this is that I've discovered the
> broadcaster list of listeners is the exact same instance across all
> PortletApplicationDeployment instances. So when I removed the CDI
listener
> from broadcaster on PortletApplicationDeployer, it also removed that
> listener from the PortletApplicationDeployment that had just been
created.
> >
> > Is that expected? I'd find it unusual that its not possible to add a
> listener specific to a deployment that should not be applied to all of
them.
> >
> > Wondering if ManagedObjectRegistryEventBroadcaster needs to support
> cloning to facilitate this functionality?
> >
> > Any other thoughts on a better way to do this are appreciated, as I
> certainly feel it unnecessary to defensively code my listener for all
types
> of portlets it can be attached to when it doesn't need to.
> >
> > Ken
> > ========================
> > Senior Software Engineer / JBoss Enterprise Middleware Red Hat, Inc.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gatein-dev mailing list
> > gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
> >
> >
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/gatein-dev/attachments/20130411/c126ae7b...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:21:41 +0200
> From: Luca Stancapiano <l.stancapiano(a)sourcesense.com>
> Subject: [gatein-dev] enable/disable users
> To: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID:
> <CAO3WqDVOGgig5AdjEf=cNA5dOFmiY5HTppGX+4Sf=+
> ASF+Rc7w(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi, I've seen there is not still the workflow for the enabling or
disabling
> of the users. It was in the old jboss portal. Are there developements in
> progress?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/gatein-dev/attachments/20130412/a30e28a6...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:28:40 +0200
> From: Boles?aw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] enable/disable users
> To: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <5167E1D8.9030803(a)redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Could you start a specification for this?
>
> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/GateInSpecifications
>
> After you write down requirements you have in mind we could discuss and
> agree on how it should look in final form.
>
> On 04/12/2013 12:21 PM, Luca Stancapiano wrote:
> > Hi, I've seen there is not still the workflow for the enabling or
> > disabling of the users. It was in the old jboss portal. Are there
> > developements in progress?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gatein-dev mailing list
> > gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
> End of gatein-dev Digest, Vol 43, Issue 7
> *****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/gatein-dev/attachments/20130412/aee4fb29...
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
End of gatein-dev Digest, Vol 43, Issue 8
*****************************************
4038
days inactive
4038
days old
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Luca Stancapiano