9:47 a.m.
Hi,
I would like to know why there is a mapping “one war file per portlet” for the responsive
portlets since GateIn 3.6 :
https://github.com/gatein/gatein-portal/tree/master/mobile-integration/po...
I would like to group them in a single war file (for obvious reasons).
what do you think ?
Julien
12:39 p.m.
On Wed 13 Nov 2013 10:47:56 AM EST, Julien Viet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know why there is a mapping “one war file per portlet” for the responsive
portlets since GateIn 3.6 :
It was done to allow for easier picking and choosing of the responsive
portlets. If someone only wanted a couple of them, they could just
include those wars.
https://github.com/gatein/gatein-portal/tree/master/mobile-integration/po...
I would like to group them in a single war file (for obvious reasons).
I guess this is really only an issue in Tomcat, since in JBoss its all
self contained within an extension ear. I don't see any problem with
having them all contained within a single war. Feel free to make that
change.
what do you think ?
Julien
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
6:48 a.m.
So on the second though there is one concern around backward
compatibility between 3.7 and 3.6. If someone referenced those portlets
in his custom container can it be migrated easily? Can it bring any
other migration issues like this?
On 11/13/2013 07:39 PM, Matt Wringe wrote:
On Wed 13 Nov 2013 10:47:56 AM EST, Julien Viet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know why there is a mapping “one war file per portlet” for the
responsive portlets since GateIn 3.6 :
It was done to allow for easier picking and choosing of the responsive
portlets. If someone only wanted a couple of them, they could just
include those wars.
>
> https://github.com/gatein/gatein-portal/tree/master/mobile-integration/po...
>
> I would like to group them in a single war file (for obvious reasons).
I guess this is really only an issue in Tomcat, since in JBoss its all
self contained within an extension ear. I don't see any problem with
having them all contained within a single war. Feel free to make that
change.
>
> what do you think ?
>
> Julien
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
--
Bolesław Dawidowicz
JBoss Portal Platform Architect | GateIn Portal Project Lead
6:58 a.m.
yes it can create such issue for people in community using the mobile extension.
however it is an extension and we wanted to make it as an improvement as having so many
portlets is not whishable and it makes on tomcat boot performance issue as it has to
deploy many war files instead of one. (we can clearly say that doing this design is an
packaging error)
for JPP you can sanitize it and keep the current portlet layout for JPP customers that
will not have to migrate.
On 25 Nov 2013, at 13:48, Bolesław Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com> wrote:
So on the second though there is one concern around backward
compatibility between 3.7 and 3.6. If someone referenced those portlets
in his custom container can it be migrated easily? Can it bring any
other migration issues like this?
On 11/13/2013 07:39 PM, Matt Wringe wrote:
> On Wed 13 Nov 2013 10:47:56 AM EST, Julien Viet wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to know why there is a mapping “one war file per portlet” for the
responsive portlets since GateIn 3.6 :
>
> It was done to allow for easier picking and choosing of the responsive
> portlets. If someone only wanted a couple of them, they could just
> include those wars.
>
>>
>> https://github.com/gatein/gatein-portal/tree/master/mobile-integration/po...
>>
>> I would like to group them in a single war file (for obvious reasons).
>
> I guess this is really only an issue in Tomcat, since in JBoss its all
> self contained within an extension ear. I don't see any problem with
> having them all contained within a single war. Feel free to make that
> change.
>
>>
>> what do you think ?
>>
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gatein-dev mailing list
>> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
--
Bolesław Dawidowicz
JBoss Portal Platform Architect | GateIn Portal Project Lead
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
4075
days inactive
4087
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bolesław Dawidowicz -
Julien Viet -
Matt Wringe