fine on our side, the gadget was never used in the product.
On 03 Dec 2013, at 14:28, Bolesław Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Migration will end up in the lack of gadget. I have just run a highly
sophisticated set of tests to verify it and yes - it vanished :)
Point taken. Pages with gadget will need to be adjusted.
Is it a concern for you and would you prefer to keep it?
On 12/03/2013 08:11 AM, Julien Viet wrote:
> I agree with the change, however doesn’t this change triggers migration
> issues for the pages that references it ?
>
> did you try a migration with a portal having the gadget ?
>
> On 03 Dec 2013, at 00:02, Nick Scavelli <nscavell(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:nscavell@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have made a PR to remove the Export/Import GWT gadget
>>
https://github.com/gatein/gatein-portal/pull/711 from GateIn (hooray,
>> finally !). The gadget has been replaced by the new Site Admin portlet
>> so no longer needed. I believe I removed all occurences of the gadget
>> in gatein, however if any extensions include the gwtGadgets as part of
>> their PortalContainerDefinitionPlugin in conf/configuration.xml, it
>> should be removed as well. Not sure if the server will still start up
>> if the dependency is listed but the war is not included. I'll prob
>> take a look at this tomorrow. Would be nice if the server still
>> started but logged a warning or something.
>>
>> - Nick
>> _______________________________________________
>> gatein-dev mailing list
>> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:gatein-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
--
Bolesław Dawidowicz
JBoss Portal Platform Architect | GateIn Portal Project Lead
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev