[portal-commits] JBoss Portal SVN: r7498 - in branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit: security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc and 1 other directory.

Author: sohil.shah(a)jboss.com Date: 2007-06-20 23:56:03 -0400 (Wed, 20 Jun 2007) New Revision: 7498 Added: branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/Permissions.java branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/SecurityContext.java Modified: branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/ branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/JACCPortalAuthorizationManager.java branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/JACCPortalAuthorizationManagerFactory.java Log: security patch to solve sync lock issue with Permissions object in JDK5 Property changes on: branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit ___________________________________________________________________ Name: svn:ignore - *.classpath *.project eclipseBin thirdparty + *.classpath *.project eclipseBin thirdparty eclipse Modified: branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/JACCPortalAuthorizationManager.java =================================================================== --- branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/JACCPortalAuthorizationManager.java 2007-06-21 03:28:18 UTC (rev 7497) +++ branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/JACCPortalAuthorizationManager.java 2007-06-21 03:56:03 UTC (rev 7498) @@ -63,6 +63,21 @@ /** . */ private PolicyConfigurationFactory pcf; + + /** + * JACC bypass + */ + private SecurityContext securityContext = null; + + /** + * JACC bypass + * + * @param securityContext + */ + void setSecurityContext(SecurityContext securityContext) + { + this.securityContext = securityContext; + } public JACCPortalAuthorizationManager(JACCPortalAuthorizationManagerFactory factory) { @@ -79,7 +94,7 @@ public void checkRoleConfig(String contextID, String roleName) throws Exception { - Map configuredRoles = factory.configuredRoles; + /*Map configuredRoles = factory.configuredRoles; synchronized (configuredRoles) { // The policy configuration @@ -104,11 +119,11 @@ if (SecurityConstants.UNCHECKED_ROLE_NAME.equals(roleName)) { - pc.addToUncheckedPolicy(container); + pc.addToUncheckedPolicy(container); } else { - pc.addToRole(roleName, container); + pc.addToRole(roleName, container); } } @@ -126,6 +141,36 @@ Policy.getPolicy().refresh(); } } + }*/ + + /** + * JACC bypass + */ + Map configuredRoles = factory.configuredRoles; + synchronized (configuredRoles) + { + if (!configuredRoles.containsKey(roleName)) + { + // Iterate over all domains to add their container + Collection domains = factory.getAuthorizationDomainRegistry().getDomains(); + for (Iterator j = domains.iterator(); j.hasNext();) + { + AuthorizationDomain domain = (AuthorizationDomain)j.next(); + JACCPortalPermissionCollection collection = new JACCPortalPermissionCollection(roleName, domain); + PermissionFactory permissionFactory = domain.getPermissionFactory(); + PortalPermission container = permissionFactory.createPermissionContainer(collection); + + if (SecurityConstants.UNCHECKED_ROLE_NAME.equals(roleName)) + { + this.securityContext.addToUncheckedPolicy(container); + } + else + { + this.securityContext.addToRole(roleName, container); + } + } + configuredRoles.put(roleName, roleName); + } } } @@ -175,12 +220,24 @@ principals = new Principal[0]; } - // + //Bypass the JACC layer and go straight to the portal security permission layer + /* ProtectionDomain pd = new ProtectionDomain(null, null, null, principals); Policy policy = Policy.getPolicy(); boolean implied = policy.implies(pd, permission); + */ + + /** + * alternately bypassing the call and not letting it go through the + * JACC system. + * + * There is not an issue with JBoss JACC implementation, but the Permissions object + * in JDK5 which is leveraged by JACC. The synchrnozied block inside Permissions object + * is causing performance bottleneck + */ + ProtectionDomain pd = new ProtectionDomain(null, null, null, principals); + boolean implied = this.securityContext.implies(pd, permission); - // return implied; } Modified: branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/JACCPortalAuthorizationManagerFactory.java =================================================================== --- branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/JACCPortalAuthorizationManagerFactory.java 2007-06-21 03:28:18 UTC (rev 7497) +++ branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/JACCPortalAuthorizationManagerFactory.java 2007-06-21 03:56:03 UTC (rev 7498) @@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ /** The configured roles. */ final Map configuredRoles = new HashMap(); + + /** + * JACC bypass + */ + private SecurityContext securityContext = null; public AuthorizationDomainRegistry getAuthorizationDomainRegistry() { @@ -61,7 +66,9 @@ public PortalAuthorizationManager getManager() { - return new JACCPortalAuthorizationManager(this); + JACCPortalAuthorizationManager manager = new JACCPortalAuthorizationManager(this); + manager.setSecurityContext(this.securityContext); + return manager; } /** Set the PolicyContext subject security handler and the delegating policy. */ @@ -92,5 +99,8 @@ // Refresh policy.refresh(); + + //JACC bypass + this.securityContext = new SecurityContext(); } } Added: branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/Permissions.java =================================================================== --- branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/Permissions.java (rev 0) +++ branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/Permissions.java 2007-06-21 03:56:03 UTC (rev 7498) @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@ +/****************************************************************************** + * JBoss, a division of Red Hat * + * Copyright 2006, Red Hat Middleware, LLC, and individual * + * contributors as indicated by the @authors tag. See the * + * copyright.txt in the distribution for a full listing of * + * individual contributors. * + * * + * This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * + * under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as * + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of * + * the License, or (at your option) any later version. * + * * + * This software is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU * + * Lesser General Public License for more details. * + * * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public * + * License along with this software; if not, write to the Free * + * Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA * + * 02110-1301 USA, or see the FSF site: http://www.fsf.org. * + ******************************************************************************/ +package org.jboss.portal.security.impl.jacc; + +import java.util.Map; + +import java.security.Permission; +import java.security.PermissionCollection; + +import EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap; + +/** + * @author <a href="mailto:sshah@redhat.com">Sohil Shah</a> + */ +public final class Permissions +{ + /** + * Key is permissions Class, value is PermissionCollection for that class. + * Not serialized; see serialization section at end of class. + */ + private transient Map permsMap = null; + + + /** + * Creates a new Permissions object containing no PermissionCollections. + */ + public Permissions() + { + this.permsMap = new ConcurrentHashMap(); + } + + /** + * Adds a permission object to the PermissionCollection for the class the + * permission belongs to. For example, if <i>permission</i> is a + * FilePermission, it is added to the FilePermissionCollection stored in this + * Permissions object. + * + * This method creates a new PermissionCollection object (and adds the + * permission to it) if an appropriate collection does not yet exist. + * <p> + * + * @param permission + * the Permission object to add. + * + * @exception SecurityException + * if this Permissions object is marked as readonly. + * + * @see PermissionCollection#isReadOnly() + */ + public void add(Permission permission) + { + PermissionCollection pc; + pc = getPermissionCollection(permission, true); + pc.add(permission); + } + + /** + * Checks to see if this object's PermissionCollection for permissions of the + * specified permission's type implies the permissions expressed in the + * <i>permission</i> object. Returns true if the combination of permissions + * in the appropriate PermissionCollection (e.g., a FilePermissionCollection + * for a FilePermission) together imply the specified permission. + * + * <p> + * For example, suppose there is a FilePermissionCollection in this + * Permissions object, and it contains one FilePermission that specifies + * "read" access for all files in all subdirectories of the "/tmp" directory, + * and another FilePermission that specifies "write" access for all files in + * the "/tmp/scratch/foo" directory. Then if the <code>implies</code> + * method is called with a permission specifying both "read" and "write" + * access to files in the "/tmp/scratch/foo" directory, <code>true</code> + * is returned. + * + * <p> + * Additionally, if this PermissionCollection contains the AllPermission, + * this method will always return true. + * <p> + * + * @param permission + * the Permission object to check. + * + * @return true if "permission" is implied by the permissions in the + * PermissionCollection it belongs to, false if not. + */ + public boolean implies(Permission permission) + { + PermissionCollection pc = getPermissionCollection(permission, false); + if (pc != null) + { + return pc.implies(permission); + } + else + { + // none found + return false; + } + } + + + /** + * Gets the PermissionCollection in this Permissions object for permissions + * whose type is the same as that of <i>p</i>. For example, if <i>p</i> is + * a FilePermission, the FilePermissionCollection stored in this Permissions + * object will be returned. + * + * If createEmpty is true, this method creates a new PermissionCollection + * object for the specified type of permission objects if one does not yet + * exist. To do so, it first calls the <code>newPermissionCollection</code> + * method on <i>p</i>. Subclasses of class Permission override that method + * if they need to store their permissions in a particular + * PermissionCollection object in order to provide the correct semantics when + * the <code>PermissionCollection.implies</code> method is called. If the + * call returns a PermissionCollection, that collection is stored in this + * Permissions object. If the call returns null and createEmpty is true, then + * this method instantiates and stores a default PermissionCollection that + * uses a hashtable to store its permission objects. + * + * createEmpty is ignored when creating empty PermissionCollection for + * unresolved permissions because of the overhead of determining the + * PermissionCollection to use. + * + * createEmpty should be set to false when this method is invoked from + * implies() because it incurs the additional overhead of creating and adding + * an empty PermissionCollection that will just return false. It should be + * set to true when invoked from add(). + */ + private PermissionCollection getPermissionCollection(Permission p, + boolean createEmpty) + { + Class c = p.getClass(); + + PermissionCollection pc = (PermissionCollection) permsMap.get(c); + if (!createEmpty) + { + return pc; + } + else if (pc == null) + { + pc = p.newPermissionCollection(); + if (pc != null) + { + permsMap.put(c, pc); + } + } + return pc; + } +} \ No newline at end of file Added: branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/SecurityContext.java =================================================================== --- branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/SecurityContext.java (rev 0) +++ branches/JBoss_Portal_2_4_1_SP1_Intuit/security/src/main/org/jboss/portal/security/impl/jacc/SecurityContext.java 2007-06-21 03:56:03 UTC (rev 7498) @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +/****************************************************************************** + * JBoss, a division of Red Hat * + * Copyright 2006, Red Hat Middleware, LLC, and individual * + * contributors as indicated by the @authors tag. See the * + * copyright.txt in the distribution for a full listing of * + * individual contributors. * + * * + * This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * + * under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as * + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of * + * the License, or (at your option) any later version. * + * * + * This software is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU * + * Lesser General Public License for more details. * + * * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public * + * License along with this software; if not, write to the Free * + * Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA * + * 02110-1301 USA, or see the FSF site: http://www.fsf.org. * + ******************************************************************************/ +package org.jboss.portal.security.impl.jacc; + +import java.security.Permission; +import java.security.Principal; +import java.security.ProtectionDomain; +import java.security.acl.Group; +import java.util.ArrayList; +import java.util.Enumeration; +import java.util.HashMap; + +/** + * @author <a href="mailto:sshah@redhat.com">Sohil Shah</a> + */ +public class SecurityContext +{ + private Permissions uncheckedPermissions = null; + private HashMap rolePermissions = null; + + /** + * + * + */ + SecurityContext() + { + this.uncheckedPermissions = new Permissions(); + this.rolePermissions = new HashMap(); + } + + /** + * + * @param roleName + * @param permission + */ + void addToRole(String roleName, Permission permission) + { + Permissions perms = (Permissions) this.rolePermissions.get(roleName); + if (perms == null) + { + perms = new Permissions(); + this.rolePermissions.put(roleName, perms); + } + perms.add(permission); + } + + + /** + * + * @param permission + */ + void addToUncheckedPolicy(Permission permission) + { + this.uncheckedPermissions.add(permission); + } + + /** + * + * @param domain + * @param permission + * @return + */ + boolean implies(ProtectionDomain domain, Permission permission) + { + boolean implied = false; + + // Next see if this matches an unchecked permission + if( uncheckedPermissions.implies(permission) ) + { + return true; + } + + // Check principal to role permissions + Principal[] principals = domain.getPrincipals(); + int length = principals != null ? principals.length : 0; + ArrayList princpalNames = new ArrayList(); + for(int n = 0; n < length; n ++) + { + Principal p = principals[n]; + if( p instanceof Group ) + { + Group g = (Group) p; + Enumeration iter = g.members(); + while( iter.hasMoreElements() ) + { + p = (Principal) iter.nextElement(); + String name = p.getName(); + princpalNames.add(name); + } + } + else + { + String name = p.getName(); + princpalNames.add(name); + } + } + if( princpalNames.size() > 0 ) + { + for(int n = 0; implied == false && n < princpalNames.size(); n ++) + { + String name = (String) princpalNames.get(n); + Permissions perms = (Permissions) rolePermissions.get(name); + + if( perms == null ) + { + continue; + } + implied = perms.implies(permission); + } + } + + return implied; + } +}