[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SHRINKWRAP-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl...
]
Dan Allen reopened SHRINKWRAP-235:
----------------------------------
Upon further review, we've got a new proposal. I still feel that the
System.out.println() breaks the spirit of ShrinkWrap's fluid API. So instead,
let's think about a more general purpose for these methods.
What we really want to do is write to a stream. So, how about this API
writeTo(Stream, Formatter)
Then we can do something like:
archive.writeTo(System.out, Formatter.VERBOSE)
This is more in spirit with the zip exporters where we are pushing the archive through to
a stream in some way. We are exporting the view of the archive in essence.
Add print methods to Archive
----------------------------
Key: SHRINKWRAP-235
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SHRINKWRAP-235
Project: ShrinkWrap
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: api, impl-base
Affects Versions: 1.0.0-alpha-11
Reporter: Dan Allen
Priority: Minor
An extremely common use case for the "toString" methods on Archive are to print
the contents of the Archive to stdout.
System.out.println(archive.toString(true));
Having to wrap the call in System.out.println is really annoying (even with editor
shortcuts). ShrinkWrap should provide parallel print methods, that print to stdout (or
perhaps to an optional stream argument).
archive.print()
archive.print(true)
archive.print(Formatter)
* parallel methods that accept a stream if warranted
* I'd also settle for printArchive()
This feature is consistent with the ever popular Exception#printStackTrace().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira