[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SHRINKRES-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Michal Matloka edited comment on SHRINKRES-27 at 11/2/12 11:39 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Assuming that we're resolving the following structure of dependencies * some pom ** parentA *** childAA *** childAB ** parentB Currently executing as File/InputStream/ResolvedArtifactInfo results in list { parentA, childAA, childAB, parentB }. Aether allows to read this not in form of such list but in form of graph (which may contain .pom's in its structure). So this complicates a little, becasue as(ResolvedArtifactInfo.class) can result in one element (pom) (one element list?) with getDependencies(); ({ parentA, parentB } and both them having their dependencies) instead of { parentA, childAA, childAB, parentB } (still used for File and InputStream) ? Then inside our implementation we have to keep both types of representations (list and graph) and pass them to FORMATSTAGETYPE (instead of current Collection<Artifact> ). was (Author: mmatloka): Assuming that we're resolving the following structure of dependencies * parentA ** childAA ** childAB * parentB Currently executing as File/InputStream/ResolvedArtifactInfo results in list { parentA, childAA, childAB, parentB }. Aether allows to read this not in form of such list but in form of graph. So I assume as(ResolvedArtifactInfo.class) should result in list of { parentA, parentB } with getDependencies(); instead of { parentA, childAA, childAB, parentB } (still used for File and InputStream) ? Then inside our implementation we have to keep both types of representations (list and graph) and pass them to FORMATSTAGETYPE (instead of current Collection<Artifact> ). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira