[bv-dev] Proposal for method validation on beanvalidation.org
gunnar.morling at googlemail.com
Tue Feb 14 16:06:09 EST 2012
many thanks for your feedback.
I've added some comments to your commit via Github. I thought that
might be easier than discussing within the actual document itself,
though I'm still not sure what's the best approach. I guess we'll see
what works out best.
2012/1/31 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>:
> Many thanks Gunnar for this big push!
> I've added comments and a few minor fixes. You can find my comments prefixed with Emmanuel.
> You can also use the diff https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org/commit/bc37cfec514b79f7695ccb35f9990115c5fdeab8
> On 29 janv. 2012, at 14:28, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I've pushed now a first version of the proposal for method validation
>> (BV-241) to beanvalidation.org .
>> The proposal is still missing some parts (e.g. the XML configuration),
>> but I hope it touches all major issues related to method validation.
>> Throughout the document I've used the "DISCUSSION" marker for sections
>> which still need further consideration or a decision between several
>> possible options.
>> I'd be very happy on any feedback related to these issues in
>> particular but of course also to the complete proposal in general.
>> Don't hesitate to speak up in case you think anything is incomplete,
>> is missing or something doesn't make sense to you; after all this is
>> very much work in progress. Feel free to add remarks in place within
>> the document or start a dedicated discussion on the mailing list.
>>  http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-241/
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
More information about the beanvalidation-dev