[bv-dev] Questions on TCK SequenceResolutionTest

Guillaume Smet guillaume.smet at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 09:34:18 EDT 2018


On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org>
wrote:

> If not that, what else would you consider as a cycle in the context of
> group sequence definitions then?
>
> This sequence definition here says: "validate TimeConsumingChecks *before*
> TestEntity" and "validate TimeConsumingChecks *after* TestEntity",
> aborting after the first group found with violated constraints. There's no
> way to implement this.
>

Not saying it makes sense but I could imagine validating
TimeConsumingChecks then TestEntity then TimeConsumingChecks again.

If we consider this a cyclic dependency, then the test is indeed valid. The
name is not very descriptive but it's not wrong either.

-- 
Guillaume
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20180330/4b4f2c01/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the beanvalidation-dev mailing list