[cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-527 / PR 271 allow proxying of classes with non-private final methods

[Thorben Janssen]

+1 to have this feature in the spec

--
*Thorben Janssen*

@thjanssen123 <https://twitter.com/thjanssen123>
www.thoughts-on-java.org

2016-02-10 8:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com>:

> -1
>
> My explanation:
> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/271#issuecomment-179105513
>
> We're going to release Weld 2.3.3.Final later this week. So both impls
> provide a non-portable solution already.
>
> However, if the EG decides to go this way I'm strongly in favor of:
> * unifying CDI configuration (something similar to Weld and OWB
> configurations)
> * NOT reusing beans.xml
> * NOT to take into account the environment variables
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 9.2.2016 v 17:36 Antoine Sabot-Durand napsal(a):
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There have been a lot of discussion around CDI-527 in the last weeks:
> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-527
> >
> > Mark proposed a PR:
> > https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/271
> >
> > But we don't agree on adding this feature to the spec.
> > This vote is to decide if we should add this feature at the spec level
> > now, or not.
> > Should we vote this feature down, that won't mean it will be completely
> > dropped: it could be implemented as non portable feature in both Spec or
> > even be included as experimental feature in the spec (in annexes) as
> > describe in the PR comments
> > Vote starts now, only vote from EG members are binding (but you can give
> > your opinion if not part of the EG) and will last 72 hours.
> >
> > You vote with the following values:
> > +1 : I'm favorable for adding this feature in the spec
> > -1 : I'm against adding this feature in the spec
> > 0 : I don't care
> >
> > Thank you for your attention and your vote.
> >
> > Antoine Sabot-Durand
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160210/7868bdf2/attachment.html