[forge-dev] Running/Building on Windows

[Ivan St. Ivanov]

Hi Lincoln, folks!

I can take a look at the formatting issue.

Cheers,
Ivan

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah. I've been meaning to check out that serialized thing for a while.
> Regarding the formatting. Sounds like something we should fix. Proposals
> welcome!
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ryan Bradley <rbradley at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>  I get the same ugliness in Linux as well (using 64-bit Fedora 15).
>> Also, by implementing 'java.io.Serializable' instead of just
>> 'Serializable', it means that the 'import java.io.Serializable' causes a
>> warning, which should be very easy to avoid.
>>
>>
>> On 03/20/2012 06:31 AM, Koen Aers wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>>  The same ugliness can be admired also on OSX…
>> But I believe I saw an issue for it.
>>
>>  Cheers,
>> Koen
>>
>>  Op 20-mrt.-2012, om 10:23 heeft Ivan St. Ivanov het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>  Hi!
>>
>>  My opinion on this (unfortunately didn't have the time to express it in
>> the other thread):
>>
>>  OK, we'll fix the test. But thus we'll just close our eyes. Here is why.
>>
>>  An entity generated by Forge looks on Windows like this:
>>
>>  package com.test.entity;
>> // Some imports go here
>> // below is the last import, and not only
>> import java.lang.Override;@Entity public class Employee implements
>> java.io.Serializable {
>>
>>  Do you see how everything is on one line? It's ugly. And I believe that
>> this happens just on Windows. And I think that the test makes sure that
>> this is avoided.
>>
>>  So if we "fix" the test to just pass, we'll keep living with this.
>>
>>  Regards,
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, we should definitely resolve this. I think by fixing the test case.
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov <
>>> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Koen,
>>>>
>>>>  You are not alone. :-(
>>>>
>>>>  You may check this recent discussion:
>>>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html
>>>>
>>>>  Do you have the same problem?
>>>>
>>>>  Regards,
>>>> Ivan
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers <koen.aers at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on Windows as I
>>>>> had to modify the startup scripts. I tested on Windows XP and Windows 7 and
>>>>> found that, while Forge builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn
>>>>> clean install' fails while running the tests for the Parser/Java module in
>>>>> both cases. Is this a known issue that I somehow missed?
>>>>>
>>>>> I also encountered some glitches while running on both those
>>>>> platforms. I found that tab completion not always seems to work and that
>>>>> commands sometimes are echoed. Anyone has the same experiences?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something, I will file
>>>>> the JIRA's with some more details tomorrow...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Koen
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120321/84e2a640/attachment-0001.html