[forge-dev] Running/Building on Windows

Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 08:02:01 EDT 2012


Thanks, Ivan!!

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov
<ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Lincoln, folks!
>
> I can take a look at the formatting issue.
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah. I've been meaning to check out that serialized thing for a while.
>> Regarding the formatting. Sounds like something we should fix. Proposals
>> welcome!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ryan Bradley <rbradley at redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>>  I get the same ugliness in Linux as well (using 64-bit Fedora 15).
>>> Also, by implementing 'java.io.Serializable' instead of just
>>> 'Serializable', it means that the 'import java.io.Serializable' causes a
>>> warning, which should be very easy to avoid.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/20/2012 06:31 AM, Koen Aers wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ivan,
>>>
>>>  The same ugliness can be admired also on OSX…
>>> But I believe I saw an issue for it.
>>>
>>>  Cheers,
>>> Koen
>>>
>>>  Op 20-mrt.-2012, om 10:23 heeft Ivan St. Ivanov het volgende
>>> geschreven:
>>>
>>>  Hi!
>>>
>>>  My opinion on this (unfortunately didn't have the time to express it in
>>> the other thread):
>>>
>>>  OK, we'll fix the test. But thus we'll just close our eyes. Here is
>>> why.
>>>
>>>  An entity generated by Forge looks on Windows like this:
>>>
>>>  package com.test.entity;
>>> // Some imports go here
>>> // below is the last import, and not only
>>> import java.lang.Override;@Entity public class Employee implements
>>> java.io.Serializable {
>>>
>>>  Do you see how everything is on one line? It's ugly. And I believe
>>> that this happens just on Windows. And I think that the test makes sure
>>> that this is avoided.
>>>
>>>  So if we "fix" the test to just pass, we'll keep living with this.
>>>
>>>  Regards,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, we should definitely resolve this. I think by fixing the test
>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov <
>>>> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Koen,
>>>>>
>>>>>  You are not alone. :-(
>>>>>
>>>>>  You may check this recent discussion:
>>>>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html
>>>>>
>>>>>  Do you have the same problem?
>>>>>
>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers <koen.aers at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on Windows as I
>>>>>> had to modify the startup scripts. I tested on Windows XP and Windows 7 and
>>>>>> found that, while Forge builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn
>>>>>> clean install' fails while running the tests for the Parser/Java module in
>>>>>> both cases. Is this a known issue that I somehow missed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also encountered some glitches while running on both those
>>>>>> platforms. I found that tab completion not always seems to work and that
>>>>>> commands sometimes are echoed. Anyone has the same experiences?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something, I will file
>>>>>> the JIRA's with some more details tomorrow...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Koen
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.org
>> "Simpler is better."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120321/de37295d/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list