[gatein-dev] Bug after merging the gatein mobile supporting stuff

[Trong Tran]

Notice that we are having an effort to address the renaming all modules to
be the same as *org.gatein.portal*. So for me, using the same artifactId is
prone to an error AND I don't think it is a good practice as the packaging
name relies on artifactId by default

On 25 July 2012 01:16, Matt Wringe <mwringe at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 19:43 +0700, Phuong Viet VU wrote:
> > Hi all, I've just seen that we have 2 bugs after GTNPORTAL-2403
> >
> > 1/ currently we have 2 projects (GATEIN/web/redirect and
> > GATEIN/portlet/redirect) with the same artifactID :
> > *<artifactId>redirect</artifactId>*
> > We should have them had difference name
>
> The groupId's are different, so this is a non-issue. Unless we have some
> sort of strange requirement on artifact id's having to be the same.
>
> > 2/ the GATEIN/portlet/redirect/src/main/webapp/jsp/*redirect.jsp
> *template
> > missing and closing tag *</div>*
>
> Why are you expecting a template?
>
> Good catch on the open div tag, will submit a pull request to get that
> fixed.
>
> > This will cause all gatein ajax request that *relate* to this portlet
> fail.
> > For example, edit page, or edit portal-layout, portal will response and
> > unwell-form xml that cause problem with many functions of portal
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > _______________________________________________
> > gatein-dev mailing list
> > gatein-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/gatein-dev/attachments/20120725/202a7ce8/attachment.html