[hibernate-dev] Releases and CI setup

Steve Ebersole steve at hibernate.org
Mon Apr 30 14:27:28 EDT 2018


Then we should move to a CI server that is not erroneously triggering jobs
it should not.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:30 AM Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> So, as expected, I'm not very happy with the new CI setup when doing
> releases.
>
> The issue is that each commit to ORM triggers at least 5 jobs (5.0, 5.1,
> 5,2, master-h2, master-check) which takes all the slave bandwidth we have.
>
> Note that I'm talking of ORM because it's where the issue is the most
> prominent but I'm pretty sure I would have the same issue with HV,
> considering we now have quite a few maintenance branches, except that the
> HV builds are faster.
>
> So I would say:
> - either we fix the issue we have with all the branches being tested for
> each commit that we discussed numerous times
> - or we need a mechanism to start specific slaves for releases - but I'm
> not sure it's fast enough tbh
>
> Because it's really annoying. Especially when you have to run your release
> job 3 times in a row due to SF.net issues...
>
> Releasing is already a tedious process, let's not make it even more
> tedious.
>
> (yeah I know it's not the first time I complain about it but it's really
> worse than it was before)
>
> --
> Guillaume
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>


More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list