[jboss-as7-dev] Distribution of testing modules

[Bruno Georges]

Does it make sense to align this with the notions of profiles?
I like the idea of shipping a lean and mean which is what applications developer are used too and look for, however new development paradigm will be relying on those modules.
Saying that I like the idea of isolating them in a different area.
I don't know what's the best option for our users, am interested to read feedbacks on this.
Maybe Max and Andrew have thoughts on how we could provide those modules to the end users (maven/Eclipse,...?) without fattening the distro.

--
Bruno Georges

On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:56, "David M. Lloyd" <david.lloyd at redhat.com> wrote:

> In our current modules distribution for AS7 we currently are distributing:
> 
> - JUnit
> - HTMLUnit
> - JSFUnit
> - Arquillian SureFire
> - the AS7 Arquillian subsystem
> - ShrinkWrap
> - Various glue and support modules for the above
> - Probably more test-oriented stuff I missed in my glance-over
> 
> The question is:
> 
> 1. Do we really want to be distributing these test frameworks?
> 2. If so, should we put them in their own area somehow?
> 3. Also if so, should be recommend, as a policy, how and when these 
> modules should be used by end users?
> 4. If not, how can we exclude them from the final build?
> 
> -- 
> - DML
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev