[jboss-dev] Re: jgroups version names
Dimitris Andreadis
dandread at redhat.com
Tue Mar 4 07:04:41 EST 2008
- You're missing some '.GA' suffixes (e.g. 2.5.2 in both repos, 2.6.2 maven only)
- Some versions appear both with & without the '.GA' suffix (e.g. latest 2.6.2 in the legacy
repo)
- In some cases using '-' instead of '.' (e.g. 2.5.0-GA, maven repo)
Am I missing something?
Bela Ban wrote:
> I adopted Scott's versioning scheme ([1]), with major, minor and patch
> numbers.
>
> Yes, when there's a need to release a CR or beta, I name the version
> 2.6.2.CR2 (for example). If you look into repository.jboss.org ([2]),
> you'll see that the versioning since 2.4.x is consistent, ditto for
> Maven ([3]).
>
>
> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> Is jgroups following any standard in the naming of its versions?
>>
>> (e.g. http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossProductVersioning)
>>
>> So far, what goes into the repositories has been consistently
>> inconsistent :-)
>>
>> E.g. look in the legacy repo
>> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/repository.jboss.org/jgroups/
>>
>> Or the new maven repo (shouldn't that be org/jgroups?)
>> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/repository.jboss.org/maven2/jgroups/jgroups/
>>
>> It could have an impact when we try to apply OSGi versioning rules.
>>
>
> [1]
> http://javagroups.cvs.sourceforge.net/javagroups/JGroups/src/org/jgroups/Version.java?revision=1.60&view=markup
>
> [2] https://svn.jboss.org/repos/repository.jboss.org/jgroups/
> [3]
> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/repository.jboss.org/maven2/jgroups/jgroups/
>
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list