[jbosscache-dev] Need for CacheLoader.storeState?

[Bela Ban]

Absolutely, I had that idea when I wrote the cache loader interface, but 
never saw it through... +1 for sure, this takes a lot of pain out of the 
implementations.

Are you guys thinking about a more efficient transfer format, or is 
NodeData still the awy to go ?

Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After we resolve streaming format incompatible cacheloader
> implementations [1][2], and as we continue to follow newly agreed
> streaming state transfer format - we do not have to require cacheloader
> implementers to write their own implementations of storeEntireState and
> storeState !
>
> CacheLoader.storeEntireState and CacheLoader.storeState are always the
> same. They read NodeData objects from stream and call put with
> underlying cacheloader. Put method does the cacheloader specific stuff. 
>
> We can possibly keep storeEntireState and storeState in CacheLoader API
> but move default implementations to AbstractCacheLoader. Any suggestions
> or opinions?
>
>
> [1] http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-748
> [2] http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-749
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
>   

-- 
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group
JBoss - a division of Red Hat