APR transport

[Dai Jun]

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Trustin Lee <tlee at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> At the moment I don't have a plan to implement kqueue support in the
> very near future, but I'm interested in supporting FreeBSD definitely.
>  Instead of using APR, I'd like to use the simpler libraries like
> libevent..

I am confused who implement NIO. As I known, JVM implement NIO in
different ways in different OS, like epoll in Linux, selector in
windows. So JAVA applications just use NIO but not care of
implementing of it. But as you discuss, it seems like Netty should be
responsible of that. Am I understanding right? Or you are discussing
NIO implementing in JVM?

>
> Just in case you are interested in improving the selector provider of
> FreeBSD NIO implementation, there's a filed issue in their issue
> tracker:
>
>  * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115773&cat=
>
> HTH,
>
> — Trustin Lee, http://gleamynode.net/
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Luis Neves <luis.neves at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Are there any plans to implement an APR transport? The reason I ask is that
>> I would like to use netty on FreeBSD but NIO on FreeBSD doesn't use kqueue,
>> it uses the less scalable poll(2).
>
> _______________________________________________
> netty-users mailing list
> netty-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
>



-- 
-
Best regards,

Dai Jun or Danny Dai in English, http://guiwuu.googlepages.com
GTalk: guiwuu at gmail.com | QQ: 93409048 | MSN: guiwuu at hotmail.com |
Twitter: guiwuu