[rules-users] Performance effect due to "eval"?

[sumatheja]

Thanks for the reply. Got it.

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
> A simplified explanation is this:
>
> An eval() contains a general Boolean expression; it is, in general,
> not possible to re-engineer one or more Contraints from it.
>
> A Constraint relates a fact field to another value. Here, indexing
> techniques can be applied, which greatly improve the Rete algorithm.
> Also, certain factoring steps (contraction of repeated Constraints
> from different left hand sides) are possible with several Constraint
> forms.
>
> Rete - even without indexing - is still better than "naive" or "brute
> force" searches.
>
> -W
>
>
> On 18 October 2010 08:47, sumatheja <sumatheja at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>        Is it true that the performance of RETE algorithm gets
>> affected if we use "eval" function in the rules conditions?
>> Can anyone explain if this is true.
>>
>> --
>> cheers
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
cheers