[rules-users] Guvnor another few questions...

[Michael Anstis]

Justin,

The I8N of locales I listed are all compiled into the existing WAR, so
unless you're adding a new locale you won't need to recompile.

GWT detects the browser and locale the user is using (or overriding locale,
as Vincent mentions) and sends the appropriate JScript.

I assume you're using the Guvnor binary distribution rather than compiling
from source (or using from an IDE?)

If you're compiling from source you'll need to run the "full" profile, as by
default we only compile for en_US for speed.

With kind regards,

Mike

On 7 July 2011 12:20, Justin Case <send_lotsa_spam_here at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi Vincent,
>
> >You can use predicates in the dialog box for editing a condition
> column.
> >There are 3 radio buttons for "value", "formula", and     "predicate"
>
> Yes, but that looks like a very very limited version of the literal value.
> I really don't see any benefit in the predicate, other than being a
> shortcut for
> choosing a field literal value = true or false... am I missing something
> here?
>
> >But I agree that template offer more possibilities (in term of rule
> >complexity) that tables, which must handle "flat" POJO. For you
> initial
> >question, ie using functions in tables, the simpler way is     to add a
> method
> >in the POJO itself, but may be not the cleaner way     ... Indeed, using
> tables
>
> >often lead to some model adaptations...
>
> We ended indeed adding a "fake" method to the POJO, and I hate it :)
>
> >You can switch the langage used by adding       "?langage=fr_FR" parameter
> to
> >the guvnor URL.
> >You can also provide a resource file translated to your favorite
> langage
> >(by browsing the trunk or a grep code) in a JIRA.
>
> Yes, and nothing happens as there's no resource file around. All these
> JIRAs say
> nothing about WHERE in the directory structure the resource file shall be
> placed... and based on Michael's answer this won't be a trivial endeavor
> (recompiling the app for a language switch?? sorry, I can't call this real
> i8n.)
>
> >POJO upload :
> >You need to "SAVE" the package (File/Save in the package tab) after     an
> >upload for the new class to be updated (and old one to be     deleted).
> "Verify"
> >
> >is not enough (was in 5.1, not in 5.2)
>
> Uh oh. This was the missing link, thanks a lot!
>
> > >Model... is there anything I can do about that? A Java POJO model
> once
> > >uploaded is just a jar blob afterwards, not usable from Eclipse
> anymore...
> >Via Webdav it (should) works if you upload a .jar file. Works in     5.2m2
> for
> >me, but you still need to save the package (and create the     import list
> in
> >the package view too, or upload a drools.package     file) to see your
> classes
>
> I see, I understand now.
> Well, unless one can upload a Java _source_ file or link it somehow, just
> seeing
> the files still doesn't bring much except some comfort "look here they
> are".
>
> >Guided editors are no longer supported by eclipse plugin (brl was,
> gdst
> >never was). Officialy due to a lack of interest from the users     ... brl
> was
> >very badly handled anyway, so may be it is better like     this.
>
> Well, at least we know where we stand. Editing them in both places didn't
> make
> much sense anyway. I'm fine with editing business rules in Guvnor, if I
> only
> could edit/link the model classes and technical rules in Eclipse...
>
> >But you can still download it to your local drive, and edit it in     XML
> (if
> >you really want to).
>
> No no thank you :)
>
> > >8. Clicking in Eclipse in the Guvnor perspective a freshly       created
> rule
>
> > >flow (nothing uploaded yet) throws an exception as well...
> >How can you have a "not uploaded yet" resource in the Guvnor
> perspective
> >(view rather that perspective I think) ?
>
> I create a new rule flow in _Guvnor_. I land on the "upload resource" tab.
> The
> RF is created but it's obviously empty. I do nothing there but immediately
> switch to Eclipse, refresh Guvnor repo view, click on the freshly created
> RF,
> bang.
>
> Many thanks,
> JC
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110707/fad392b4/attachment.html