[rules-users] Found solution vs actual optimum [planner]

[Geoffrey De Smet]

Op 08-02-13 23:27, john poole schreef:
> I ran the benchmarker and it's showing that I should be using simulated
> annealing. So that's useful info.
>
> I'm only getting 525-650 for the average calculate count per second though.
> (I didn't realize I could get it without the benchmarker until reading the
> docs again)
>
> I'm going through "Score calculation performance tricks" now, but I didn't
> see anything about the hardware used for the expected "1000" value. If my
> older laptop is sort of crappy( a Pentium(R)2.2GHz), that would explain the
> difference, correct?
It's still a sign to check if none of the score rules are a bottleneck.
The way I do that, is to create a stepLimit benchmark (see docs howto)
and then comment out 1 rule at a time to see the impact of adding that rule.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Found-solution-vs-actual-optimum-tp4022027p4022175.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>