[rules-users] ruleflow-group vs. agenda-group vs. activation-group ?

[Mark Proctor]

On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:16, Péter Gergely, Horváth <h.peter at mailbox.hu> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I've been experimenting with agenda-group and ruleflow-group features and I am now a bit confused. The documentation states that agenda-group and ruleflow-group features have been merged, but I'm not sure how this relates to activation groups.
it doesn’t. That is a separate thing, and unchanged.
> 
> ruleflow-groups used to be a rule-flow feature, driven by the .RF file, requiring JBPM engine behind the scenes. Agenda-group work without the presence of JBPM: does it mean we can use the RF file for visualizing the agenda-groups as well?   
All it means is that the rule flow now calls setFocus() when it reaches a ruleflow-group.
> 
> Could someone please shed some light on the differences between these constructs? Which one is the currently recommended approach (when?) for controlling rule execution flow?
So an ruleflow-group and an agenda-group are now the same thing. RuleFlow is an additional thing to orchestrate the calling of the ruleflow/agenda-group.
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users