[seam-dev] Interceptor packaging convention

[Dan Allen]

>
> One possible alternative is to give interceptors aliases (@Named) so the
> developer can activate the function ("seam.security") and not the class
> ("org.jboss.seam.intercept.SecurityInterceptor").
>
> But that, of course, would require a spec change (or a non-portable
extension).

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100326/c1d4c5be/attachment-0001.html