Re: [gatein-dev] Change to WCI registration proposal

On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 15:22 +0100, Julien Viet wrote: > I like it, it's simple and easy to use. > > a couple of questions: > > 1/ are you able to test it ? As part of the automated tests, I am able to test that you can disable the registration of certain web applications, and that you can manually add the disabled web applications using the GateInServlet. I have wasted a lot of time trying to get a test written that will compare when any normal servlet is started and when the webapplication gets registered (ie this basically just tests load-on-startup between the normal servlet and when the gateinservlet does its registration). No luck here so far.

> 2/ it would be part of the next minor wci release ? If everything is ok, I would like to release a new version of wci as soon as possible with this feature.

> On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Matt Wringe wrote: > >> There have been a couple of issues arising from the ordering of portlets >> and servlets being out of sync. For example see >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GTNPC-76 >> >> This isn't really a bug, since the ordering of when portlets and >> servlets are initialized is not suppose to be guaranteed. But I have a >> couple of changes to wci which will allow for this behaviour (see patch >> attached to GTNPC-76) >> >> Basically there are 2 new features which when used together will provide >> ordering between portlets and servlets. >> >> 1) by using a context-parameter in the web.xml, we can tell the native >> wci implementation to not register the specific webapp. >> >> 2) you can now manually add an application to the wci native >> implementation. >> >> To control ordering: >> - add in the context-parameter so the native implementation doesn't >> register the webapplication (and therefor PC doesn't know about it) >> - specify the generic GateInServlet in the web.xml and use the >> load-on-startup value to control ordering against other servlets. The >> GateInServlet will manually register itself to the native >> implementation. >> >> Any objections? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gatein-dev mailing list >> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev >