+1
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Nick Scavelli <nscavell(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Not only the burden of doing the mapping and maintaining it, but you
also
have documentation, and possibly of supporting multiple versions, etc. I
would rather support one format starting out and add additional ones if
there's a strong need rather then remove a format because a) it's hard to
maintain, b) users don't really use one vs the other.
On 04/27/2012 10:38 AM, Julien Viet wrote:
you don't want to do XML because it would be an additional burden to do
the object / XML mapping ?
or just because you think XML is so 2000 ?
On Apr 27, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Nick Scavelli wrote:
Sorry, thought I sent this email yesterday...
I created a poll here
https://community.jboss.org/polls/1100 for some fun
and to discuss about which format to support for the REST API of GateIn. I
would recommend people vote and comment, especially if you vote for both
:). We can obviously discuss here in more detail. I plan to follow up with
some more details on some of my findings thus far after I work out a couple
more prototypes.
- Nick
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev