9:57 a.m.
I've been thinking of moving Apiman to the SemVer 2.x versioning
scheme (http://semver.org/) to provide a more meaningful and
consistent release number scheme.
Does anyone foresee that being a problem or have any thoughts?
Regards,
Marc
12:41 p.m.
+1, I thought you already were..
On Jun 29, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Marc Savy <marc.savy(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
I've been thinking of moving Apiman to the SemVer 2.x versioning
scheme (http://semver.org/) to provide a more meaningful and
consistent release number scheme.
Does anyone foresee that being a problem or have any thoughts?
Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
Apiman-dev mailing list
Apiman-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/apiman-dev
4:44 a.m.
Up until now our scheme had been to put (external/visible) breaking
API changes as minor releases and new features as patch.
In many ways we'd just be shifting to the left!
On 29 June 2017 at 18:41, Kurt Stam <kstam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
+1, I thought you already were..
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Marc Savy <marc.savy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I've been thinking of moving Apiman to the SemVer 2.x versioning
> scheme (http://semver.org/) to provide a more meaningful and
> consistent release number scheme.
>
> Does anyone foresee that being a problem or have any thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Marc
> _______________________________________________
> Apiman-dev mailing list
> Apiman-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/apiman-dev
2506
days inactive
2507
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Kurt Stam -
Marc Savy