Re: [keycloak-dev] M1 progress

From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Wednesday, 4 December, 2013 7:45:26 PM Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] M1 progress Being able to change an ID is not a good idea. DB constraints et. al. -1. Let's keep realm Name and ID in the data model, but just set the ID to be the name on creating. But only for realms, not anything else please. It should be possible to have same app names in different realms. On 12/4/2013 1:15 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: > Keycloak is looking pretty good now, and it looks like we're in good shape > to release M1 this week. > > One thing I don't like is the realms being looked up based on a generated > id. I really don't like urls being '../realms/32450982309/tokens/..' > instead of '../realms/myrealm/tokens/..'. We can easily fix this by > letting users set the id in the admin console. We should also display the > id throughout as well as the name. If there's no objections I'll sort this > out tomorrow. > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev > -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev