Waiting for the resolution. I need to update datasource definitions for
tests in case the change remains as it is, please confirm. Thanks
V.
On 09/26/2016 08:32 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Can't we just leave it as is and document if someone does indeed
have
a custom provider with a separate datasource they need to change it?
On 23 September 2016 at 21:31, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com
<mailto:bburke@redhat.com>> wrote:
The User Storage Provider SPI example uses a different datasource than
KeycloakDS. What I found is that switching Keycloak to use JTA
creates
a problem. If you have 2 non-xa datasources in the same JTA
transaction, Wildfly barfs. It doesn't allow it. The workaround is
have only one non-xa datasources and have all the rest be xa
datasources, or to make them all be xa-datasources.
I'm changing the KeycloakDS to be an xa-datasource. I don't think
this
will effect anybody's application, although i'll need to note in
documentation that this is required and changed.
Bill
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev