Re: [keycloak-dev] KEYCLOAK-4853
The unique ID is being returned as part of the Location header. This is a
standard way of doing things. I don't like your proposal of returning an ID
header as that's something custom that at least I've not seen done
elsewhere.
I appreciate the fact that the Location header has to be parsed, but adding
a new custom header isn't the solution IMO.
We would not consider this for 3.x so it wouldn't be merged until the new
year at the earliest. We'd also need an agreed pattern that should be
discussed on the mailing list prior to sending a PR. It would have to be
complete (all endpoints updated) and come with tests.
On 14 December 2017 at 15:38, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm planning to start to submit some PRs for
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-4853 . If I start to get them to
you in the next few days, what would release would they target. Some of
the items I'm looking to immediately leverage are:
- Create User
- Create Group
- Create IDP
These are the important ones since fetching the data a second go around
requires that unique ID in the URL.
John
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev