Re: [keycloak-dev] Versioning - Keycloak Operator

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 8:02 PM Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > Good afternoon, > > During our stand-up meeting today we discussed the versioning of the > new Keycloak Operator. In summary, if the versioning should follow the > same scheme as semantic versioning, or follow our continuous delivery > model[1]. > > The "old" Operator is actually on 1.9.4 and the new version should be > 2.0.0. But if we use our current versioning scheme, that means a > significant bump, for example, 8.0.0. > +1 for version of the operator being aligned with the version of other components (server, adapters etc.), even if this will mean: - Operator version will need initially to get bumped substantially to match the Keycloak server version, - Operator would need to be released together with other components this way (IOW any, even possible urgent Operator fixes would need to wait for N+1 server release). This makes more sense / is more consistent IMHO, than keeping the Operator version as a separate one. Besides that (as already mentioned) it removes the need in the future (maybe often?) to clarify, which Operator version matches which Keycloak server version. Just my two cents. Thank you && Regards, Jan -- Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Keycloak / RH-SSO Team > > I kind of know the answer :) But the team wanted to ask. > > [1] - https://www.keycloak.org/2019/04/versioning.html > > -- > - abstractj > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev > _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev