On 10/7/2014 8:54 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
If they're in the PR they're lost once it's merged, so we
should put them in the commit.
In the WFLY project, I think we are rewriting the
commit messages when
the PR is merged. That way it is always referenced and always shows up
in the JIRA.
If you link the PR in the JIRA then you can always go back to the commits.
That being said, I'm fine with whatever you guys want to do. But I
agree that we need some way to track this.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stan Silvert" <ssilvert(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Daniel Passos" <daniel(a)passos.me>
> Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 October, 2014 2:42:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] JIRA usage
>
> On 10/6/2014 6:31 PM, Daniel Passos wrote:
>
>
>
> I don't like refer JIRA in commit message. I prefer refer it in PR. apart of
> that +1
> Sounds reasonable to me.
>
>
>
>
> -- Passos
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Stan Silvert < ssilvert(a)redhat.com > wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> On 10/2/2014 3:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> A few things I'd like us to follow with regards to using JIRA:
>>
>> * Create a JIRA for all changes/fixes/improvements - unless they have no
>> effect on users
>> * When completing an issue mark as resolved (not closed) - we'll close when
>> we do a release (otherwise we can't change fix version without re-opening
>> the issue)
>>
>> A few things for Git:
>>
>> * Try to keep it to a single commit per-JIRA
>> * Refer to JIRA issue in the commit message
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev