It depends on how we want to provision Keycloak. :)
On 9/20/2013 8:13 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Makes sense - I assume it would be a war module that can be deployed
separately to the auth-server war?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, 20 September, 2013 1:03:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Moving admin console into a separate project
>
> +1 on separate module, -1 on separate project. We can't really have a
> separate project until we have an actual release of Keycloak. Open
> source projects need to be able to build and run out the box. I'm not
> having the admin UI work against snapshots.
>
> On 9/20/2013 7:39 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> I've already mentioned this as part of the discussion around M1, but I
>> thought it would make sense to create a separate thread for it here.
>>
>> I propose that we move the SaaS admin console into a separate project in
>> github (
http://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-admin?). This would allow
>> releasing the console separately from the core Keycloak server. Also, it
>> allows not deploying the SaaS admin console if it's not required (for
>> example for MBaaS, or for a simple internal server where config files/cli
>> is used instead).
>>
>> Also, I believe that the admin console should use TokenService for
>> authentication, and that we drop all authentication, registration, etc.
>> from SaasService.
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>