Editable effective Roles
by Yunus ÖNCEL
I have a simple and short Question
is it possible? I want editable assigned roles (effective roles). Example
A Person have a composite Role(10 Role ) and B Person have too a same
composite role (9 roles) . I don't want create new composite role to a role.
Thank you
10 years
Community curated Keycloak Extensions Repository
by Thomas Darimont
Hello Group,
I was wondering whether it would make sense have some kind of
community backed keycloak-extensions organisation on github in order
to collect various extensions to Keycloak.
This organisation could contain repositories with community curated
extensions
that would be independently released from keycloak with installation
descriptions
with JBoss CLI scripts for installing them.
For instance:
- FederationProviders
- EventListeners
- Authenticators
- RequiredActions
- Themes
- Docker Containers
Cheers,
Thomas
10 years
TokenEndpoint is potentially too restrictive
by Thomas Darimont
Hello Group,
I just found out that as long as a user has a required_action set up one
cannot authenticate via grant_type password throught the TokenEndpoint
because of this line in
TokenEndpoint.buildResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant
if (user.getRequiredActions() != null && user.getRequiredActions().size() >
0) {
event.error(Errors.RESOLVE_REQUIRED_ACTIONS);
throw new ErrorResponseException("invalid_grant", "Account is not fully
set up", Response.Status.BAD_REQUEST);
}
current master:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/bd2887aa77184d82e795e4200eb55a3...
1.9.x
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/e7822431fded5948a5e248766e6ffbf...
I think that this is too restrictive. Imagine a default required action
that has no user interaction but records some user login statistics like
last login date, count logins, login failures etc.
In this case it would be better to check if the configured required_action
requires user-interaction (e.g. via a new method boolean isInteractive())
or communicate that required actions should not be used for actions that
don't require user interactions - an authenticator is then probably the
better choice.
Cheers,
Thomas
I tested this with a required action like the
LoginStatsRecordingRequiredActionProvider listed below.
Now setup a client with the name test-client and a user with the name
tester.
With that deployed to keycloak as a default action one can use the
following curl command
to see the problem.
KC_REALM=test-realm
KC_USERNAME=tester
KC_PASSWORD=test
KC_CLIENT=test-client
KC_CLIENT_SECRET=e9ca8fad-d399-4455-5290-817102e7f9ff
KC_SERVER=192.168.99.1:8080
KC_CONTEXT=auth
curl -k -v --noproxy 192.168.99.1 \
-H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
-d "grant_type=password" \
-d "username=$KC_USERNAME" \
-d "password=$KC_PASSWORD" \
-d "client_id=$KC_CLIENT" \
-d "client_secret=$KC_CLIENT_SECRET" \
"http://
$KC_SERVER/$KC_CONTEXT/realms/$KC_REALM/protocol/openid-connect/token"
Gives:
< HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
< Connection: keep-alive
< X-Powered-By: Undertow/1
< Server: WildFly/10
< Content-Type: application/json
< Content-Length: 75
< Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 08:24:59 GMT
{"error_description":"Account is not fully set up","error":"invalid_grant"}
----
package com.acme.keycloak.ext.authentication;
import static java.util.Arrays.asList;
import java.time.Instant;
import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.TimeZone;
import org.jboss.logging.Logger;
import org.keycloak.Config.Scope;
import org.keycloak.authentication.RequiredActionContext;
import org.keycloak.authentication.RequiredActionFactory;
import org.keycloak.authentication.RequiredActionProvider;
import org.keycloak.models.KeycloakSession;
import org.keycloak.models.KeycloakSessionFactory;
import org.keycloak.models.UserLoginFailureModel;
import org.keycloak.models.UserModel;
/**
* Collects information about User Login behaviour.
* <p>
* Collects the following:
* <ul>
* <li>Date / Time of first login</li>
* <li>Date / Time of recent login</li>
* <li>Count of logins since first login</li>
* <li>Count of failed logins since the configured <code>Failure Reset
Time</code> unter <code>Security Defenses</code></li>
* </ul>
* <p>
* This {@link RequiredActionProvider} is Stateless and can be reused.
*
* @author tdarimont
*/
public class LoginStatsRecordingRequiredActionProvider implements
RequiredActionProvider, RequiredActionFactory {
private static final Logger LOG =
Logger.getLogger(LoginStatsRecordingRequiredActionProvider.class);
private static final String PROVIDER_ID = "login_stats_action";
private static final String RECORD_LOGIN_STATISTICS_ACTION = "Record Login
Statistics Action";
private static final String LOGIN_LOGIN_COUNT = "login.login-count";
private static final String LOGIN_FAILED_LOGIN_COUNT =
"login.failed-login-count";
private static final String LOGIN_FAILED_LOGIN_DATE =
"login.failed-login-date";
private static final String LOGIN_FIRST_LOGIN_DATE =
"login.first-login-date";
private static final String LOGIN_RECENT_LOGIN_DATE =
"login.recent-login-date";
private static final String ONE = "1";
private static final String ZERO = "0";
private static final LoginStatsRecordingRequiredActionProvider INSTANCE =
new LoginStatsRecordingRequiredActionProvider();
@Override
public void close() {
// NOOP
}
@Override
public void evaluateTriggers(RequiredActionContext context) {
UserModel user = context.getUser();
try {
recordFirstLogin(user);
} catch (Exception ex) {
LOG.warnv(ex, "Couldn't record first login <{0}>", this);
}
try {
recordRecentLogin(user);
} catch (Exception ex) {
LOG.warnv(ex, "Couldn't record recent login <{0}>", this);
}
try {
recordLoginCount(user);
} catch (Exception ex) {
LOG.warnv(ex, "Couldn't record login count <{0}>", this);
}
try {
recordFailedLogin(user, context);
} catch (Exception ex) {
LOG.warnv(ex, "Couldn't record failed login <{0}>", this);
}
}
private void recordFailedLogin(UserModel user, RequiredActionContext
context) {
UserLoginFailureModel loginFailures = context.getSession().sessions()
.getUserLoginFailure(context.getRealm(), user.getUsername());
if (loginFailures != null) {
user.setAttribute(LOGIN_FAILED_LOGIN_COUNT,
Arrays.asList(String.valueOf(loginFailures.getNumFailures())));
user.setAttribute(LOGIN_FAILED_LOGIN_DATE,
Arrays.asList(getLocalDateTimeFromTimestamp(loginFailures.getLastFailure()).toString()));
} else {
user.setAttribute(LOGIN_FAILED_LOGIN_COUNT, Arrays.asList(ZERO));
}
}
private void recordLoginCount(UserModel user) {
List<String> list = user.getAttribute(LOGIN_LOGIN_COUNT);
if (list == null || list.isEmpty()) {
list = asList(ONE);
} else {
list = asList(String.valueOf(Long.parseLong(list.get(0)) + 1));
}
user.setAttribute(LOGIN_LOGIN_COUNT, list);
}
private void recordRecentLogin(UserModel user) {
user.setAttribute(LOGIN_RECENT_LOGIN_DATE,
asList(getLocalDateTimeFromTimestamp(System.currentTimeMillis()).toString()));
}
private void recordFirstLogin(UserModel user) {
List<String> list = user.getAttribute(LOGIN_FIRST_LOGIN_DATE);
if (list == null || list.isEmpty()) {
user.setAttribute(LOGIN_FIRST_LOGIN_DATE,
asList(getLocalDateTimeFromTimestamp(System.currentTimeMillis()).toString()));
}
}
@Override
public void requiredActionChallenge(RequiredActionContext context) {
// NOOP
}
@Override
public void processAction(RequiredActionContext context) {
context.success();
}
@Override
public RequiredActionProvider create(KeycloakSession session) {
return INSTANCE;
}
@Override
public void init(Scope config) {
LOG.infov("Creating IdM Keycloak extension <{0}>", this);
// NOOP
}
@Override
public void postInit(KeycloakSessionFactory factory) {
// NOOP
}
@Override
public String getId() {
return PROVIDER_ID;
}
@Override
public String getDisplayText() {
return RECORD_LOGIN_STATISTICS_ACTION;
}
private LocalDateTime getLocalDateTimeFromTimestamp(long timestampMillis) {
return LocalDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochSecond(timestampMillis /
1000), TimeZone.getDefault().toZoneId());
}
}
10 years
Disabling error notification in admin console
by Mitya
Hi,
By default, if admin console receives a HTTP 500 from any underlying
REST resource, it will pop up a small notification (implemented by
errorInterceptor, app.js:1775).
I'm developing a KeyCloak extension that includes a custom REST
resource and adds GUI elements to admin console. Instead of standard
notification, I'd like to pop up a modal dialog with verbose error
description received from the server. Everything works fine (with
$modal.open), but that default notification lingers behind my dialog. I
know it's a purely cosmetic issue, but still a bit annoying. Is there
any way to get rid of that notification in case modal dialog is used?
Thx,
Mitya
10 years
A minor bug in user detail screen
by Hiroyuki Wada
Hello,
I found a minor bug in user detail screen. Could I create a JIRA issue
and send a PR?
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure Identity Provider
2. Add new user
3. Open the user detail screen
4. Click 'Federation Link' label
Expected Result:
Nothing happened.
Actual Result:
'User Enabled' toggled.
Regards,
--
Hiroyuki Wada
10 years
Tomcat 8 Arquillian Tests
by Pedro Igor Silva
Hi,
Is that command correct in order to get adapter tests running against a Tomcat 8 app server ?
mvn -Pauth-server-wildfly -Papp-server-tomcat8 -Pexamples clean install -Dtest=Tomcat8DemoExampleAdapterTest
Regards.
Pedro Igor
10 years
Is including adapter libs directly in WAR supported on WildFly/EAP
by Stian Thorgersen
Do we support (or need to support) including adapter libraries directly in
the WAR? Or should we just support using the subsystem?
If we support including libraries directly that may not work at the moment
and would certainly require documenting and also testing, so my vote is to
only support the subsystem approach.
10 years
How to setup a maven project generating jar containing authentication providers in a debug mode in eclipse
by Rashmi Singh
We have a Maven project setup on Eclipse that uses some keycloak features
and we generate a jar that contains our AuthenticationProvider classes etc.
We use docker for the deployment. We basically run a jboss/keycloak image
there
We have a shell script that has a bunch of commands to copy our project
jars from local to the keycloak image on docker container like:
docker cp /customauthenticator-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
keycloak:/home/modules/xxx.yyy.zz.keycloak.customizations
....
docker restart keycloak
Running this shell script deploys everything on keycloak on docker.
And so far we are just putting logs throughout our code to debug issues.
We want to be able to setup a debugging environment on our eclipse. I am
not sure how to achieve this when we use keycloak. Because, here we
basically build our modules or authenticator jars etc and copy them to
keycloak directories. So, it's not a standalone project war file that we
are directly deploying to app server as such. So, then how do we put our
maven project (creating jars etc) in a debug mode in eclipse? Is it
possible? How?
10 years
