Re: [keycloak-dev] new provider deployer working on branch!

I've implemented a Keycloak provider deployer and it works great. I re-implemented the JPA User Storage SPI example. The provider is now a @Stateful EJB and EntityManager access is all managed by @PersistenceContext. The example now looks really simple and elegant rather than the crap I mentioned before. Would not have worked without the JTA integration I did (see previous email). Things left to do: * hot deployment. Pretty sure I can implement this * Make sure things work in WARs and EARs. * Also thinking of defining a @KeycloakProvider annotation that you can use on your ProviderFactories. This would remove the need to specify a META-INF/services file and the annotation could be scanned for at deployment. Would work like this: @KeycloakProvider(UserStorageProviderFactory.class) public class MyProvider ... { } As a side note, one thing I could look into is the ability to use @Inject of a KeycloakSession. Developer could then write entire web applications that are deployed separately and worked with the keycloak API directly. @Inject KeycloakSession would work similarly to @PersistenceContexts EntityManager. KeycloakSessions would be associated with a transaction. This will give us nice integration with Java EE and give a lot of power to developers wanting to extend keycloak. _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev