Re: [keycloak-dev] feature request

You can obviously use DNS settings and the machines hosts file to change what IP address the name resolves to. https://machine.local could resolve to 10.0.0.12 or 192.168.1.12 depending on where it's called from. On 12 October 2016 at 06:59, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > [Adding list again] > > Token based security relies on HTTPS for security. You need to use the > HTTPs domain name when you are contacting Keycloak. The HTTPs domain should > match the issuer of the domain. > > On 11 October 2016 at 18:56, Mátyás Bachorecz <bachoreczm(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> My token audience does not match, because we request for a token via >> floating ip (openstack, like 10.xx.xx.xx), and would like to validate via >> private ip (like 192.168.xx.xx). So my question is how to solve this >> problem? >> >> There are two machines, one belongs to user, and on the other we running >> keycloak, and a client, which can validate token. But client only nows the >> private ip, and user can't access keycloak on private ip, cause he/she is >> not in that network. >> >> Br, >> Matyi >> >> On 11 October 2016 at 18:45, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Rather than hacking Keycloak you should figure out why your token >>> audience doesn't match. For a token to be valid it has to been issued by >>> the same server URL and realm. It's an important check and we wouldn't >>> accept a feature that prevents it. >>> >>> On 11 October 2016 at 17:07, Mátyás Bachorecz <bachoreczm(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we have a multi-component project, and all components running in one >>>> machine, also Keycloak. >>>> We would like to obtain token via curl, and our components would like >>>> to >>>> validate it, but they can't, because we've got: >>>> "Token audience doesn't match domain. Token issuer is " + >>>> token.getIssuer() >>>> + ", but URL from configuration is " + realmUrl (RSATokenVerifier.java) >>>> >>>> I would like to implement a new feature: a new checkbox or something >>>> else >>>> to realm settings page, which can switch off the above mentioned >>>> feature. >>>> I've read that I should write an email here if I would like to >>>> implement >>>> something. Is it ok, or how it works? >>>> >>>> Br, >>>> Matyi >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> keycloak-dev mailing list >>>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >>>> >>> >>> >> >