Re: [keycloak-dev] is UserManager really unused?

I would really like it if we could use Keycloak in LiveOak without requiring dependencies on Resteasy/JAX-RS. So if we could separate out all business logic from JAX-RS code, including OAuth logic, that would be great. The sooner we could have this the better. At the moment we're starting an embedded Undertow server on LiveOak for Keycloak, which is far from ideal. Using Netty would be less than elegant as well, as LiveOak provides it's own layer to create restful services. We don't have to do it before M1, but if we could do it after M1 that would be great. I'd be more than happy to do the legwork if you want. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Wednesday, 20 November, 2013 2:13:12 PM > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] is UserManager really unused? > > I forget what I was going to use it for, but I guess we can ditch it for > now. I don't know if you've noticed but, I've been trying to separate > JAX-RS code from Business Logic from Storage logic. Thus the > Resource/Manager/Model splits. Hopefully the end result can be an API > that can be used programmatically. There's still a lot of thought and > refactoring to do here. > > On 11/19/2013 11:53 AM, Viliam Rockai wrote: >> Hey, >> >> Could the class org.keycloak.services.managers.UserManager be safely >> deleted? >> >> It doesn't seem to be used anymore and if I delete it, tests are >> passing. Just wanted to be sure if someone doesn't have any intentions >> with it anymore. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Viliam >> _______________________________________________ >> keycloak-dev mailing list >> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >> > > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >