5:20 a.m.
On 22 July 2016 at 12:02, Marko Strukelj <mstrukel(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> A few questions from me:
>
> * Is it possible to view the returned JSON when creating and updating a
> client? This contains values filled in by the server, including the
> registration access token.
>
Not ATM. I can add an option e.g. -o, --output Display the new state
of client configuration.
Please do
> * Should we not enable pretty print by default?
>
I suppose that would be more user friendly. Just don't know how to name
the switch -p, --pretty is so obvious ...
-u --ugly ;)
or a more serious suggestion
-c --compressed
> * --cache isn't the most intuitive name, I don't have a better suggestion
> though
>
OpenShift client uses the term configuration rather than cache, and uses
--config accordingly. We could do the same, and even add 'kcreg config'
command to inspect and edit the config file if we deem that necessary.
+1 --config is better - config would be nice as well
* Docs should be moved to Gitbook "Securing Clients and Applications guide"
>
The only doc currently is the README file, so I guess that's the one you
mean. I'd wait a bit with adding it to docbook. The later I make a copy in
Gitbook the less double work will there be editing the changes.
Sure, just remember to do it before moving on to Admin CLI
> * When creating clients and later updating them I assume it uses the
> registration access token from the cache?
>
Yes. If it can't find one it uses bearer token from login.
> * A nice addition would be the ability to list attributes from
> ClientRepresentation so it's easy to discover what attributes can be set
>
That's trivial to add using reflection. But how would the UI look? Ideally
we'd have tab completion for this at some point.
Something like this?
$ kcreg list-attrs
clientId String
redirectUris List<String>
baseUrl String
enabled Boolean
...
$ kcreg list-attrs -e oidc
redirect_uris List<String>
grant_types List<String>
That's fine and you only need it for our representation. I wouldn't use
Java names for types though, rather use JSON names
However if we want to be more specific, with some additional help on the
meaning, and possible values, then we would need to annotate Representation
classes with the necessary info, or simply have a help-style static text.
> * What about setting/changing complex attributes, how does that look
> like? Can we add/remove to an array? Add/remove elements to a complex
> object? Something like JSON patch could be nice
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902
>
I haven't gone so far with this iteration. That's a TODO.
Ok, would nice to visit before we start on Admin CLI as it would be
incredibly useful there.
>
> On 22 July 2016 at 09:26, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> It should be fairly easy to add support for OTP as well as the direct
>> grant supports that. The user would have to specify to use OTP though.
>>
>> On 21 July 2016 at 19:15, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice work Marko! I had two (not big deal) questions. First, when you
>>> specify the --cache parameters as you did for SAML, could the cache
>>> file be omitted?
>>>
>>> For example: kcreg --cache -r saml-realm ...
>>>
>>> I was thinking that once you specified the realm name, the API will just
>>> look for ~/.keycloak/saml-realm.cache. It's just an idea.
>>>
>>> Second question, is more like something to think if worth to take
>>> into consideration. Most of the examples that I saw, make use of
>>> username/password. But if the admin enables two factor authentication,
>>> she might be unable to use our client-reg CLI, or enforce weaken
>>> security only
>>> to make use of the CLI.
>>>
>>> Is OTP support planned for further iterations?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2016-07-21, Marko Strukelj wrote:
>>> > And if anyone wants to get their feet wet already:
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
https://github.com/mstruk/keycloak/tree/cli-reg/integration/client-regist...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Stian Thorgersen <
>>> sthorger(a)redhat.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Great work Marko!
>>> > >
>>> > > As we didn't have time to go through feedback let's use
this thread
>>> for
>>> > > it. Add your questions and comments here please.
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > keycloak-dev mailing list
>>> > > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > keycloak-dev mailing list
>>> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> abstractj
>>> PGP: 0x84DC9914
>>>
>>
>>
>