I recently made a fix for role mappers to address what is identified
below
as case (2) "Sync".
Following Marek's analysis, I now realize the vast diversity of possible
use cases.
Regarding any new configuration feature to tune the expected behavior, I
am suggesting to configure this at the level of the identity provider
rather than down to the mapper.
I think in most cases it would be configured at the IdP level, but some
would most likely want to override that behaviour at the mapper level. One
example here:
* User logs in using Google - the IdP is configured with import as the
admin wants to manage users within Keycloak after first login, but the
profile-url claim is not managed within Keycloak hence that particular
mapper is set to sync
So we could configure identity providers as either "import only",
"sync"
with "local admin lock" option.
Admin locking external roles (and more generally attributes) would be an
attribute at the user level.
Locking attributes and roles is something we want to drive through user
profile feature we will be introducing in the future as that will be
capable of providing metadata around profiles in order for account and
admin consoles (and associated REST endpoints) to prevent editing certain
attributes of the user.
*Frédéric BIDON*
frederic.bidon(a)yahoo.com
On Friday, September 27, 2019, 1:23:04 PM GMT+2, Stian Thorgersen <
sthorger(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'll get a design proposal written up around this, then we have something
to refer to on how we want to address this issue.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 12:57, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 11:52, Marek Posolda <mposolda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 25. 09. 19 14:23, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>
>> Thinking about this some more. I think all mappers for identity
brokering
>> should have an option to select sync-mode:
>>
>> * import - only update on first import
>> * owner - if the idp is the owner of the user (the user has not been
>> modified within KC, and only has a single IdP link)
>> * force - always update
>>
>> The mappers that today has a behaviour that doesn't match one of the
>> above could have an option "legacy".
>>
>>
>> On the IdP config itself there should be a default sync-mode user for
>> mappers that haven't explicitly set the sync-mode. The default value
should
>> be import.
>>
>> +1 for this part. With the small note that not all mapper
implementations
>> may need this option. For example UsernameTemplateMapper.
>>
>
> What does UsernameTemplateMapper actually do? Perhaps for those where it
> doesn't make sense to have an option it should display the sync-mode, but
> in non-editable mode?
>
>
>> The next piece of the puzzle would be to prevent editing of values that
>> shouldn't be possible to edit locally. For user attributes that should
be
>> driven by User Profile SPI, where it would be somehow possible to for
>> example say don't allow editing this attribute if one of the following
>> IdPs. I'm working on a design proposal for the User Profile SPI
currently,
>> so we can add that as a requirement there. The same feature could be
used
>> for User Federation providers. For roles it is a bit harder, but would
be
>> nice to somehow be able to flag what roles are managed by
IdP/user-storage
>> and which are not. Perhaps we could add some metadata to the role
mapping
>> for that.
>>
>> Yes, will be great to have this capability on User Profile SPI.
>>
>> I am not sure about metadata for role/group mappings. There will be some
>> added complexity in that and not sure it deserves the benefits - also
>> considering that role/group memberships is something, which is editable
>> just by administrator and not by user himself in account console.
>>
> Remember that very often there will be one person configuring Keycloak
and
> setting up the IdPs and a completely different person managing users and
> roles/groups. I think it would be nice to be able to show that a
role/group
> mapping is managed externally, but I agree it's not the top priority.
>
>> Regarding User Profile SPI, I can imagine that it will be nice to have
>> the ability to automatically update the metadata/requirements based on
some
>> events? For example when we add support for "temporary" users
registered
>> through IDP, those users will be typically read-only. So I can imagine
that
>> when administrator creates IDP with temporary users, there will be an
>> event, which will automatically add rules to User Profile SPI that all
>> attributes of such user should be read-only. Similarly when you have
>> read-only LDAP provider or SSSD provider, you may also want auto-created
>> User Profile metadata specifying that users should be non-editable. I am
>> not sure whether to count with this in the User Profile SPI design or
not?
>>
> Not sure. Right now I've not really covered this part in the user profile
> design as I haven't really thought it through. I'm kinda thinking about 2
> options. First 1 where attributes can have different config based on the
> source, and another where you define different user profiles. The latter
is
> probably simpler and cleaner. Let's move further discussion on this part
> elsewhere though.
>
>> Marek
>>
>>
>> Would be great to start on a design proposal around this, so we can have
>> it documented the way it should work. Once we have that and have agreed
on
>> the approach I don't mind having PRs for individual mappers merged as I
>> appreciate the fact that for this case you want a solution for hardcoded
>> role mapper quickly without having to do all of the work for all the
other
>> mappers.
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 12:36, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-8690
>>>
>>> Adding to my point that we need a consistent solution/strategy for all
>>> mappers.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 12:32, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 09:42, EXTERNAL Thiele Frank (TNG,
>>>> INST-CSS/BSV-OS2) <external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is an interesting point. I checked some mappers:
>>>>>
>>>>> - AttributeToRoleMapper handles the update like the import
>>>>> with the exception that in case of an update, the role is deleted
if
the
>>>>> attribute is no longer present (I call this for now inverted
logic).
>>>>>
>>>>> - ClaimToRoleMapper and ExternalKeycloakRoleToRoleMapper
>>>>> handle an update with the inverted logic only – so they don’t set
but only
>>>>> delete the role.
>>>>>
>>>>> - HardcodeRoleMapper fully ignores updates whereas it could
at
>>>>> least do it the same way as AttributeToRoleMapper.
>>>>>
>>>>> - UserAttributeMapper is even more complex…
>>>>>
>>>>> So the currently used IdentityProviderMapper implementations are
very
>>>>> inconsistent and hopefully documented and understood well for and
by
the
>>>>> end users.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is not documented and I doubt anyone can understand how it will
>>>> function. This is my concern when we have "random" things
happening
in each
>>>> mapper without an overall consistent plan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All I am saying is that it will become a breaking change to
globally
>>>>> define this behavior as there are nowadays several, conflicting
modes
>>>>> implemented. Due to that I would like to emphasize that the flag
>>>>> introduction (“handleUpdateToo”) still seems as the solution with
the
>>>>> lowest friction.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Adding a flag to an individual mapper is just a solution to your
>>>> problem and it doesn't address the wider issue. It is basically a
>>>> work-around for your use-case, and is introducing yet another
behaviour on
>>>> top of the already inconsistent behaviour we have today.
>>>>
>>>> Of course we need anything new that is added to be able to match the
>>>> current behaviour, which will be more and more difficult the more
random
>>>> switches and config options we have in mappers. So we really do need
to
>>>> have a proper solution in thought out, then figure out how to address
it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Frank Thiele *
>>>>> Open Source Services 2 - Product Group Customer Success Services
>>>>> (INST-CSS/BSV-OS2)
>>>>> Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Ullsteinstr. 128 | 12109 Berlin |
>>>>> GERMANY |
www.bosch-si.com
>>>>> Tel. +49 30 726112-0 | Fax +49 30 726112-100 |
>>>>> external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB
148411 B
>>>>> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke;
Geschäftsführung:
>>>>> Dr. Stefan Ferber, Michael Hahn, Dr. Aleksandar Mitrovic
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Von:* Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 25. September 2019 08:38
>>>>> *An:* Marek Posolda <mposolda(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> *Cc:* Schuster Sebastian (INST-CSS/BSV-OS2) <
>>>>> Sebastian.Schuster(a)bosch-si.com>; EXTERNAL Thiele Frank (TNG,
>>>>> INST-CSS/BSV-OS2) <external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com>;
>>>>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [keycloak-dev] A newly added Hardcoded Role mapper
>>>>> ignores users that have already logged in before
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Adding config options on a single mappers is not really a great
>>>>> solution. We need to make sure there is a consistent approach
throughout.
>>>>> We probably don't have consistent and predictable behaviour
today,
but I
>>>>> would rather not make it worse by introducing random config options
on
>>>>> mappers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Main question is if this should be controlled on individual mappers
or
>>>>> if it should mainly be a config on the identity provider.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Having the config on the identity provider would make more sense as
it
>>>>> would be simpler to configure and it would avoid corner cases.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There's probably at least 3 different modes for identity
brokering
>>>>> that should be supported:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Import only - User is only imported if it doesn't exist. If
user
>>>>> already exists nothing is updated.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Sync - Allow changes to the user within Keycloak, but also sync
>>>>> changes from external IdP
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) External - Do not allow any changes to the user within Keycloak
as
>>>>> the user should be fully managed from the external IdP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Option 1 is trivial.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Option 2 can be very complicated. Take the example of the hardcoded
>>>>> role for instance. User first logs in, the role is added. An admin
then
>>>>> removes the role from the user. User logs in again and the role is
>>>>> re-added. Same example can be applied to last name for instance.
User logs
>>>>> in. 6 months later the user changes the last name in Keycloak
account
>>>>> console, but then next day when they re-login the last name is
changed back.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Option 3 is relatively trivial, but would need some tweaks within
>>>>> Keycloak. A user that is fully externally managed should not be
able
to use
>>>>> Keycloak account console and should be view-only in the admin
console.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 22:21, Marek Posolda
<mposolda(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Makes sense to me. From me +1 for this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Marek
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20. 09. 19 15:57, Schuster Sebastian (INST-CSS/BSV-OS2) wrote:
>>>>> > I guess the point was just to add a configuration flag to the
mapper
>>>>> enabling the update on existing users.
>>>>> > If that flag is not there or set to false, the old behavior
stays.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best regards,
>>>>> > Sebastian
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Dr.-Ing. Sebastian Schuster
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Open Source Services (INST-CSS/BSV-OS2)
>>>>> > Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Ullsteinstr. 128 | 12109
Berlin |
>>>>> GERMANY |
www.bosch-si.com
>>>>> > Tel. +49 30 726112-485 | Mobil +49 152 02177668 | Telefax +49
30
>>>>> 726112-100 | Sebastian.Schuster(a)bosch-si.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB
>>>>> 148411 B
>>>>> > Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke;
>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Dr. Stefan Ferber, Michael Hahn, Dr. Aleksandar
Mitrovic
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>> > Von: keycloak-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org <
>>>>> keycloak-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org> Im Auftrag von Stian
Thorgersen
>>>>> > Gesendet: Freitag, 20. September 2019 15:25
>>>>> > An: EXTERNAL Thiele Frank (TNG, INST-CSS/BSV-OS2) <
>>>>> external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com>
>>>>> > Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> > Betreff: Re: [keycloak-dev] A newly added Hardcoded Role
mapper
>>>>> ignores users that have already logged in before
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'm afraid you've lost me on the last one as I'm
not following ;)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:17, EXTERNAL Thiele Frank (TNG,
>>>>> INST-CSS/BSV-OS2) <external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Hi,
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> What if I implement a newer version of the Hardcoded Role
mapper
>>>>> that
>>>>> >> has a (optional, as configuration migration case) flag to
activate
>>>>> >> update handling. So when the flag is set to false or not
set at
all
>>>>> >> (migration case), then behavior is as of today. If the flag
is
set,
>>>>> >> the import and update functions behave the same way.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> *Frank Thiele *
>>>>> >> Open Source Services 2 - Product Group Customer Success
Services
>>>>> >> (INST-CSS/BSV-OS2)
>>>>> >> Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Ullsteinstr. 128 | 12109
Berlin
|
>>>>> >> GERMANY |
www.bosch-si.com Tel. +49 30 726112-0 | Fax +49
30
>>>>> >> 726112-100 | external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg;
HRB
>>>>> 148411
>>>>> >> B
>>>>> >> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke;
>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Dr.
>>>>> >> Stefan Ferber, Michael Hahn, Dr. Aleksandar Mitrovic
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> *Von:* Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> >> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 19. September 2019 13:51
>>>>> >> *An:* EXTERNAL Thiele Frank (TNG, INST-CSS/BSV-OS2) <
>>>>> >> external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com>
>>>>> >> *Cc:* keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> >> *Betreff:* Re: [keycloak-dev] A newly added Hardcoded Role
mapper
>>>>> >> ignores users that have already logged in before
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> If memory serves me correctly this was on purpose where
the
>>>>> thinking 5
>>>>> >> years ago was that users would be imported on first login,
then
>>>>> >> managed from Keycloak after that. That is not always the
case
though
>>>>> >> and we should have some way of controlling if users updated
on
>>>>> >> subsequent logins and perhaps also be able to fine-tune
what is
>>>>> updated.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 13:21, EXTERNAL Thiele Frank (TNG,
>>>>> >> INST-CSS/BSV-OS2)
<external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Hello,
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> In our project, we use the "Hardcoded role"
mapper within a
>>>>> configured
>>>>> >> Identity Provider (also a Keycloak instance, in our case
the same
>>>>> but
>>>>> >> a different realm) to describe that each user logging in
via
>>>>> Keycloak
>>>>> >> shall be given a certain role.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> This works perfectly if the mapper is configured before the
first
>>>>> >> login of the user. The configured role is granted to the
(cloned)
>>>>> user
>>>>> >> when he logs in the first time via Keycloak.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> But when another "Hardcoded role" mapper is added
to configure
>>>>> another
>>>>> >> role, then the user is not given the other role when he
logs in.
>>>>> Only
>>>>> >> new users logging in the first time get both roles
assigned.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Is this on purpose or a bug?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Frank Thiele
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Open Source Services 2 - Product Group Customer Success
Services
>>>>> >> (INST-CSS/BSV-OS2) Bosch Software Innovations GmbH |
Ullsteinstr.
>>>>> 128
>>>>> >> |
>>>>> >> 12109 Berlin | GERMANY |
www.bosch-si.com<http://www.bosch-si.com
<
>>>>> >>
http://www.bosch-si.com%3chttp:/www.bosch-si.com>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com<mailto:
>>>>> >> external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com<mailto:
>>>>> >> external.Frank.Thiele(a)bosch-si.com%
>>>>> >> 3cmailto:external.Frank.Thiele@bosch-si.com>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg;
HRB
>>>>> 148411
>>>>> >> B
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke;
>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Dr.
>>>>> >> Stefan Ferber, Michael Hahn, Dr. Aleksandar Mitrovic
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>> >> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>>> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev