Why would someone get a non-cached model/provider? Wouldn't it be better to
prevent that instead.
On 5 November 2016 at 01:16, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I was thinking that we change all Mongo and JPA adapters, and
RealmProvider and UserProvider methods that can update or remove models
from the database and have them evict the cache of that type. This will
make sure that if somebody gets a non-cached model or provider and
performs an update, the cache is still invalidated. Sound ok?
Thanks,
Bill
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev