ok, merged. Found that oracle and mssql are broken, so looking at those
now:-(
I seem to have fix for oracle already, need to test a bit more and then
look at mssql...
On 5.8.2014 15:02, Bill Burke wrote:
YOu find bugs, typos, etc. Fix them, you have until lunch my time
(eastern USA).
On 8/5/2014 8:43 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
> Added another commit for deleting of users on mongo . Both are one
> liners and I hope they are quite safe to be included though.
>
> Marek
>
> On 5.8.2014 13:33, Marek Posolda wrote:
>> On 5.8.2014 13:04, Marek Posolda wrote:
>>>>> * The semantics of "searchForUser" is a bit different for
>>>>> >>FederationProviders and our model implementations. For
example,
>>>>> if you
>>>>> >>have user "John Doe" and you search for "ohn
Do" in admin
>>>>> console, then
>>>>> >>both JPA and Mongo local providers will return you "John
Doe"
>>>>> as they
>>>>> >>add % at the beginning/end. However federation providers are
>>>>> looking
>>>>> >>exactly for FirstName: "ohn" , LastName:
"Do", so if "John Doe"
>>>>> exists
>>>>> >>in LDAP, he won't be returned.
>>>>> >>
>>>> >Can we do anything about that? Does LDAP have a "like"?
>>> yes, LDAP has * . Workaround, which works for me is to put directly
>>> search string like:*ohn Do* into admin console, but this is not
>>> pretty
>>> and is LDAP specific though.
>> btv. Found a typo when test ldap searching. Not sure if it's ok to
>> commit at this stage, so just send PR for that
>>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/590 .
>>
>> Marek
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>