Yes, as you would have to know to switch between realms. Defeats the
idea of Aerogear looking like one product.
On 5/1/2014 11:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Is that really an issue?
Users would just be admin users, there would be a separate realm for AeroGear users.
And there'd probably be a single AeroGear console application, with a few associated
roles.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 1 May, 2014 4:47:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] management problems
>
>
>
> On 5/1/2014 11:41 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, 1 May, 2014 4:37:39 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] management problems
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2014 11:24 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 1 May, 2014 4:19:26 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] management problems
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2014 10:16 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 1 May, 2014 3:11:48 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] management problems
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/1/2014 9:30 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm wondering about what issues there are with having
a single shared
>>>>>>>> admin
>>>>>>>> realm though. That seems the optional solution to me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Isn't the issue multi-tenancy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can grant admin users access to manage only specific realms
though?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or are you thinking multi-tenancy for AeroGear?
>>>>>
>>>>> What I mean is that you want to manage Aerogear in a realm on a
server
>>>>> that is multi-tenant (1 server managing multiple realms). Can't
really
>>>>> have a single shared admin realm in that case.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still not following :/
>>>>
>>>> Can you spoon-feed me an example?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Aerogear UPS admin needs to:
>>>
>>> * manage users
>>> * manage role mappings
>>> * manage oauth clients
>>> * Manage aerogear specific things
>>>
>>> You want to have one login to do all those things. This means there
>>> needs to be one realm to do all these things. You could re-use the
>>> "keycloak-admin" realm, but re-using the "keycloak-admin"
realm doesn't
>>> work if you're dealing with a Keycloak deployment that is managing
>>> multiple realms. A.K.A. Multi-tenancy.
>>
>> The part I'm not understanding is why it doesn't work with a Keycloak
>> deployment with multiple realms?
>>
>
> Because you're polluting the "keycloak-admin" realm with Aerogear
> specific things: users, roles, applications, etc.
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
>