What would be your time frame for 1.1?
W dniu 03/09/14 08:39, Stian Thorgersen pisze:
I'm happy with that ordering, although I'd say Open ID
Connect
interoperability should be amongst the top 3.
Also, I was wondering if we should base our adapters on existing
OAuth2/OpenID Connect adapters instead of writing them from scratch?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com> To:
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Tuesday, 2 September, 2014
> 5:36:34 PM Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Features for 1.1
>
> Forgot one.
>
> On 9/2/2014 11:34 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>> I put them in my opinion of priority order
>>
>> * Clustering * SAML * Uberfire Integration (BRMS) * Fuse FSW *
>> JIRA Integration (for potential
sso.jboss.org deployment). *
>> SPNEGO Kerberos, so we can integration with OpenIPA (also an
>>
sso.jboss.org deployment requirement too) . * Open ID Connect
>> interoperability * Tomcat Adapter * Jetty Adapter * Pure servlet
>> adapter * Node.js Adapter * Internationalization
>
> * Improved claim support. Custom claim definition and entry.
>
>> * TOTP improvements - we need a SPI to be able to add more
>> multifactor authentication mechanisms, as well as support for
>> admins to register totp tokens on behalf of users (hardware
>> tokens) * IP filtering, fail2ban features.
>
>
> -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev
> mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
_______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing
list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Bolesław Dawidowicz
JBoss Portal Platform Architect | GateIn Portal Project Lead