Re: [keycloak-dev] session.userLocalStorage() needs to be fronted by cache

2.4.1 On 11/21/16 1:42 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: We're about to release 2.4.0.CR1. When will this be ready? On 21 November 2016 at 17:18, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I think I made a mistake when User Storage Providers are importing into > local cache. Currently KeycloakSession.userLocalStorage() does not have > a cache in front of it. The LDAP and Kerberos providers call this to > determine if the user has been imported or not. The thing is, the user > may already be cached and I think there is a possibility of updating the > user (on demand resync) and getting stale cache entries. Also, we don't > want a database hit every time there is validation happening. > > So, I'm going to figure out a way to have the cache front the > userLocalStorage() method too like we do for userStorage(). This will > require some refactoring of UserCacheSession. Not sure if that will > conflict with Marek's work. > > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >