Re: [keycloak-dev] Separate Maven for PicketLink and MongoDB
I wonder why PicketLink IDM is viewed at par with MongoDB here. Would
it not be better if MongoDB Identity Store implementation was added to
PicketLink and that was used?
That way KeyCloak API could depend on PicketLink IDM API for file,
ldap,DB,mongodb,cassandra,HDFS,HBase (and you name it) identity stores.
I know we do not yet have implementations for identity stores for
mongo,cassandra etc in PL yet.
On 09/20/2013 06:45 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
I propose that we move the adapters for PicketLink and MongoDB into
separate Maven modules. IMO the code in services is already a bit crowded, and with the
addition of a MongoDB implementation it will only get worse. If we add a SPI for these it
would be easier in the future to add more. It would also be possible for users to write
their own if they really need to.
This will also make it possible for us to release M1 with either PicketLink or MongoDB
even if the non-default implementation is not fully working at the time.