I 100% agree with pagination on the server side. I'd like to start with the Groups page. I'm assuming the API will have to change. I'll use the Users page as a template. On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:38 AM Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Not 100% sure what the current status is. Some are paginated server-side, > some on client-side, some are missing pagination. Users are paginated on > server side for sure. > > For a large portion of tables though pagination has to be done on server > side (users, clients, roles, groups, etc. can all have large number of > entries). With that in mind I think to keep things consistent we should do > pagination and sorting on the server side for everything. > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 15:57, KevinO <oneal.kevin(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Stian, could you point me to a table that currently has server side >> pagination? And is there currently an effort to make all tables have >> server-side pagination? >> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:05 PM KevinO <oneal.kevin(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >> > Is there any opposition to me adding column sorting? There is the >> ticket >> > for it: >> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-4676 >> > >> > I've tested a solution that uses standard angular ordering. I don't >> want >> > to update all the tables if this is a feature that is not wanted. >> > >> > Here is what one option of sorting would look like using Font-Awesoms >> > chevron as the clickable item. >> > [image: image.png] >> > [image: image.png] >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> keycloak-dev mailing list >> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev > >