5:25 a.m.
Hiya
I was wondering if aspects should has user enrollment and workflows is on
the cards for Keycloak. Or would you regard this as another product? ... an
example being Forgerocks OpenIDM
Rohitih
5:44 a.m.
It's on the horizon, but nothing that is planned for the immediate future.
On 18 October 2016 at 12:25, gambol <gambol99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hiya
I was wondering if aspects should has user enrollment and workflows is on
the cards for Keycloak. Or would you regard this as another product? ... an
example being Forgerocks OpenIDM
Rohitih
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
7:39 a.m.
Along the lines of feature sets. One of the biggest gripes that pops up is
User management and ability to delegate responsibility of a 'group or
groups' to another member without have to give them admin to the realm. I
was wondering if managerial control over a set of groups is on the cards.
i.e. allow members, x y and z to manage the admin group (add members etc).
I guessing at present given the way members are being authorized, via roles
in the issued jwt tokens, fine grains controls isn't yet available without
big changes?? ...
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
It's on the horizon, but nothing that is planned for the
immediate future.
On 18 October 2016 at 12:25, gambol <gambol99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hiya
>
> I was wondering if aspects should has user enrollment and workflows is on
> the cards for Keycloak. Or would you regard this as another product? ...
> an
> example being Forgerocks OpenIDM
>
> Rohitih
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
8:50 a.m.
I assume that's a different requirement to user enrollment and workflows.
We have an open issue to allow granting admins access to limited groups of
users, clients, etc.. See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-3444 for
more details. You can add a comment to that issue to describe what you need.
On 18 October 2016 at 14:39, gambol <gambol99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Along the lines of feature sets. One of the biggest gripes that pops
up is
User management and ability to delegate responsibility of a 'group or
groups' to another member without have to give them admin to the realm. I
was wondering if managerial control over a set of groups is on the cards.
i.e. allow members, x y and z to manage the admin group (add members etc).
I guessing at present given the way members are being authorized, via roles
in the issued jwt tokens, fine grains controls isn't yet available without
big changes?? ...
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> It's on the horizon, but nothing that is planned for the immediate
future.
>
> On 18 October 2016 at 12:25, gambol <gambol99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hiya
>>
>> I was wondering if aspects should has user enrollment and workflows is
on
>> the cards for Keycloak. Or would you regard this as another product? ...
>> an
>> example being Forgerocks OpenIDM
>>
>> Rohitih
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
2991
days inactive
2991
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
gambol -
Stian Thorgersen