3:49 p.m.
As highlighted by the UXP team the registration screen is not very nice. I propose we
remove the address fields from the registration and account management. Instead we should
have an example theme that shows adding additional fields to the screens.
4:17 p.m.
Go for it. I think the ldap tests depend on it though :)
On 8/13/2015 9:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
As highlighted by the UXP team the registration screen is not very
nice. I propose we remove the address fields from the registration and account management.
Instead we should have an example theme that shows adding additional fields to the
screens.
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
4:40 p.m.
I think not. Ldap tests are using some custom attributes like street or
postalCode, but AFAIR don't depend on fields available in UI in account
management or registration screen.
IMO will be good to show also multivalued attributes in the theme
example ( plus, minus buttons - something similar like we have for
"redirect uris" or "web origins" in client details screen in admin
console).
Marek
On 13.8.2015 16:17, Bill Burke wrote:
Go for it. I think the ldap tests depend on it though :)
On 8/13/2015 9:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> As highlighted by the UXP team the registration screen is not very nice. I propose we
remove the address fields from the registration and account management. Instead we should
have an example theme that shows adding additional fields to the screens.
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
5:33 p.m.
On 8/13/2015 9:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
As highlighted by the UXP team the registration screen is not very
nice. I propose we remove the address fields from the registration and account management.
Instead we should have an example theme that shows adding additional fields to the
screens.
Could you also get rid of First Name and Last Name? Why are they
required fields?
Incidentally, to properly localize the account management screen to
China, you would put the Last Name before the First Name. As I
understand it, putting the given name before the family name can be
considered disrespectful. So it might be a bad thing to have those
fields hard-coded anyway.
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
7 p.m.
On 13.8.2015 17:33, Stan Silvert wrote:
On 8/13/2015 9:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> As highlighted by the UXP team the registration screen is not very nice. I propose we
remove the address fields from the registration and account management. Instead we should
have an example theme that shows adding additional fields to the screens.
Could you also get rid of First Name and Last Name? Why are they
required fields?
Incidentally, to properly localize the account management screen to
China, you would put the Last Name before the First Name. As I
understand it, putting the given name before the family name can be
considered disrespectful. So it might be a bad thing to have those
fields hard-coded anyway.
Question is where exactly is the border between
"basic" and "advanced"
info :-)
To me, first name and last name belongs to "basic" info and 90% of
deployments want it here IMO. If someone really doesn't want firstName
and lastName or he wants them in different order, he can edit theme file
by himself and do whatever he want.
Marek
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
7:27 p.m.
On 8/13/2015 1:00 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
On 13.8.2015 17:33, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 8/13/2015 9:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> As highlighted by the UXP team the registration screen is not very
>> nice. I propose we remove the address fields from the registration
>> and account management. Instead we should have an example theme that
>> shows adding additional fields to the screens.
> Could you also get rid of First Name and Last Name? Why are they
> required fields?
>
> Incidentally, to properly localize the account management screen to
> China, you would put the Last Name before the First Name. As I
> understand it, putting the given name before the family name can be
> considered disrespectful. So it might be a bad thing to have those
> fields hard-coded anyway.
Question is where exactly is the border between "basic" and
"advanced"
info :-)
To me, first name and last name belongs to "basic" info and 90% of
deployments want it here IMO. If someone really doesn't want firstName
and lastName or he wants them in different order, he can edit theme
file by himself and do whatever he want.
That's probably reasonable, but why
are they required fields? Sometimes
a user is not a person.
Marek
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
3179
days inactive
3179
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bill Burke -
Marek Posolda -
Stan Silvert -
Stian Thorgersen