On 9 May 2016 at 12:29, Marek Posolda <mposolda(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > * Currently we support admin events just for 'success' cases. We don't > log any error situations or missing permissions. Is it sufficient? > +1 To errors, create a jira for 2.0.cr1 > > * Some minor usability issues: > ** For both classic events and admin events, there is filtering by Date > (from or to). Couldn't we add some "nice" component for easily select > date? Also the "from" date is included, but "to" date is excluded. This > may not be obvious. Shouldn't we somehow mention it in tooltips? > +1 PatternFly was about to add one when we did this, but it wasn't ready yet. JIRA for 2.0.cr1 please. > > ** In "Auth details" for admin events, there is filtering by "Realm" , > "Client" or "User". It may not be obvious, that this points to IDs. To > be even more confusing, in "classic" events there is "Client" too, but > that points to clientId (not database ID). Also in many situations, > admins don't know the UserID or client database ID, so there is > additional action required from them that they need to lookup ID it > first. For clients, the client database ID is not even visible in admin > console, so they need to decode either from URL or from some existing > event. I wonder if we should add possibility to filter by "username" or > "clientId"? For users maybe even filtering by email? In case that > "username" or "email" or "clientId" is filled, admin will need to fill > the "realm" too. > Events doesn't always have username, username can also change over time. So user id isn't the reliable thing to use. We could add something to allow looking up userid by username or something though.

> _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >